What WCAG 3.0 Can Tell Us About the Future of Digital Accessibility

At UPCEA SOLAR 2026, OES Learning Solutions joined Stevie Rocco of Penn State University for a session that asked an important question about how we should be thinking about inclusivity in higher education:

What changes when accessibility is treated not simply as a compliance requirement, but as a catalyst for better learning? For PSU, said Rocco, accessibility has become a continuous investment in innovation and inclusion.

Our discussion at SOLAR reinforced something we see repeatedly in our own work with institutions: accessibility creates the greatest value when it is embedded into the learning experience from the outset, rather than overlaid at the end.

That distinction matters because the global digital landscape is being reshaped by regulatory developments such as America’s ADA Title II, Australia’s DDA, and Europe’s EAA. These changes are important and long overdue. They point towards a future in which full and dignified participation in digital spaces is treated as a fundamental right.

But regulation can only take us so far.

Too often, organizations reduce the spirit of accessibility standards to a narrow pursuit of minimum compliance. While urgent remediation may sometimes be unavoidable, the institutions making the most meaningful progress are asking a broader question: how can accessibility improve the experience for every learner?

A useful lens for answering that question is the developing WCAG 3.0 standard. Although it remains a working draft, it offers important clues about where digital accessibility is heading — away from a narrow checklist mentality and towards a more human-centered, holistic understanding of whether people can meaningfully access, understand, and engage with digital experiences.

For higher education, that shift has significant implications.

Accessibility Beyond the Page

One of the most significant changes proposed for WCAG is the broadening of its scope. WCAG 2.x provides guidelines for the accessibility of web pages, with some support for mobile devices and applications. The current draft proposes broadening this scope to include content accessed across different devices, dynamic and interactive media, streaming services, augmented and virtual reality, digital productivity suites, and the tools used to create and manage content.

This expanded scope has particularly significant implications for digital learning environments. If retained in the final standard, accessibility would no longer apply only to the learning content itself, but to the entire learning experience: from infrastructure to impact.

The developing model indicates that learning management systems, authoring tools and virtual classrooms could become part of the accessibility equation, requiring inclusive design considerations from the outset rather than as a later fix. For higher education institutions, this broader scope encourages teams to examine accessibility across the full digital learning ecosystem, rather than treating individual course pages as isolated compliance units.

What this means for organizations

From an OES Learning Solutions perspective, a practical place for higher education institutions to begin is with a mobile-first mindset. Mobile experiences often intensify constraints that can also affect disabled users, including smaller screens, alternative input methods, environmental distractions and reliance on assistive technologies. Designing for these realities can support clearer, simpler and more intentionally prioritized learning experiences for all users.

A More Human Approach

Perhaps the biggest shift from 2.x to 3.0 is in how accessibility success is framed. WCAG 2.x framed success around the web content itself. It asked, “Is this content perceivable, operable, usable, and robust (POUR) enough for disabled people to use it?” WCAG 3.0 is exploring a model that brings the user back into the spotlight and simplifies the question to the infinitely more elegant: “Are user needs being met?”

Technical requirements remain essential, but they are no longer the sole measure of success. Instead, the current draft proposes grounding each guideline in WCAG 3.0 in a documented user need. Requirements describe what must be present to meet that need, while methods provide guidance on how to do so. 

WCAG 3.0 uses core requirements and supplemental requirements. The lowest conformance level (bronze) must meet all core requirements as well as a percentage of supplementary requirements.

Importantly, the current draft proposes a broader, more inclusive approach. Where WCAG 2.x placed greater emphasis on physical and sensory barriers, WCAG 3.0 is exploring a model that gives cognitive accessibility more equal prominence.

In learning environments, accessibility has often been verified by confirming the presence of features such as captions or transcripts. Under the user-needs model proposed in the current WCAG 3.0 draft, the question widens: not just whether those features exist, but whether learners can meaningfully engage with content, reflect on it, and progress independently. In this sense, the developing model reinforces a powerful idea: inclusive learning and effective learning are the same thing.

What this means for organizations

This shift would challenge organizations to move beyond asking “Can users access this?” toward “Can users understand, engage with, and use this without undue effort?”

In practice, this means designing for clarity and simplicity, managing cognitive load intentionally, embedding inclusive design practices into everyday workflows, and recognizing neurodiversity as part of the mainstream audience rather than an edge case.

From fixed checkpoints to a more flexible conformance model

WCAG 3.0 is exploring a more flexible approach to conformance than WCAG 2.2. The current draft is organized around user-centered guidelines, supported by requirements, assertions and technology-specific methods. Core requirements are intended to contribute to a base level of conformance, while supplemental requirements could allow organizations to address a broader range of accessibility needs.

The details are still being developed. W3C cautions that the structure and conformance model may change, so organizations should not treat the current draft as a final compliance framework. Its value today lies in the direction it signals: broader coverage, closer attention to user needs and greater recognition of accessibility practices that extend beyond a single technical test.

Crucially, accessibility success is reframed as a journey of continuous improvement, encouraging organizations to start where they are.

What this means for organizations

The developing scoring approach could remove a major psychological barrier to action. By recognizing progress rather than demanding perfection, WCAG 3.0 is exploring ways to make it safer and more meaningful for organizations to start improving accessibility immediately.

For learning and digital teams, this could create space to experiment, mature practices, and embed accessibility into everyday workflows. Organizations that lean into this mindset now may be better prepared for WCAG 3.0. They will already be building more inclusive, trustworthy, and resilient digital experiences.

Preparing for the Next Era of Accessibility

As WCAG 3.0 continues to evolve, the developing model signals a possible shift toward a more human-centered and inclusive digital world. While the guidelines are not yet final, their draft status should not be used as a reason to delay accessibility improvements.

For learning professionals and digital leaders alike, this is a reminder that accessibility is not a destination to be reached once standards are settled, but an ongoing commitment to meeting people where they are.

Download the Accessibility Playbook

Rebecca Haupt is Accessibility Specialist at OES Learning Solutions.