Major Updates
- UPCEA Joins National Opposition to Federal Compact
UPCEA has joined with over thirty higher education associations to make a statement opposing the federal government’s proposed “Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education.” The coalition, coordinated by ACE, warns that the compact would impose federal conditions on what and how colleges teach, threatening academic freedom and institutional autonomy. UPCEA’s participation underscores the shared concern across all sectors of higher education, including online and professional education, that innovation and independence must remain central to the mission of U.S. colleges and universities. Read the full statement. - Let Your Legislators Know – Contact Congress Now to Oppose Cuts to FWS and to Save FSEOG
The House has written its education funding bill, proposing the elimination of the Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (FSEOG) and a nearly 40% cut to Federal Work-Study (FWS). If enacted, these cuts would be detrimental to low-income students who need additional resources to access postsecondary education and succeed to degree completion. It is critical that Congress hear your opposition to these cuts. Please tell your Representative and Senators to oppose the elimination of FSEOG and funding cuts to FWS. Please contact your Representative and Senators today!
UPCEA is a proud member of the Student Aid Alliance. - Invite Your Students to the 2026 DC Student Summit
Being held this coming March 23-25, the three-day DC Student Summit in our nation’s capital will equip students with the skills necessary to elevate their stories and lived experiences directly to federal policymakers. Led by the Today’s Students Coalition (of which UPCEA is a steering committee member), students will have the opportunity to: learn how to effectively share their stories with policymakers; hear about the most pressing issues in D.C. related to higher education; engage in conversations with dozens of congressional offices and representatives from both the legislative and executive branches of government. Read more and share with students.
Other News
- Reimagining and Improving Student Education (RISE) Committee Negotiated Rulemaking (U.S. Department of Education)
- Second Session occurring November 3-7. Register to watch live.
- VA Seeks Comments on Distance Education Definitions (Due November 3)
- Preparing Four-Year Institutions for Workforce Pell (UPCEA)
- Higher ed groups push for colleges to be exempt from $100K H-1B visa fee (Higher Ed Dive)
- In Fourth Week, Government Shutdown Increasingly Hinders Higher Ed (Inside Higher Ed)
- Department of Education’s Government Shutdown Plan (U.S. Department of Education)
- Higher Education Litigation Summary – October 28 (Thompson Coburn LLP)
Two weeks ago, we examined the transformation of higher education in the next five years. Today, we look at how this transformation will shift the emphasis of our teaching.
As with the prior column, this week’s thesis evolves out of the Zoom Keynote to the Rethink AI Conference, sponsored in part by the International Academy of Science, Technology, Engineering and Management and hosted by the ICLED Business School in Lagos, Nigeria. Thanks again to the Chair of the International Professors Project, Sriprya Sarathy and the conference committee for making my presentation possible.
Virtually all aspects and positions at universities will be touched by the transformation. The changes will come more rapidly than many of us in higher education are accustomed to or with which we are comfortable. In large part, the speed will be demanded by employers of our learners and by competition among universities. Change will also strike directly at the nature of what and how we teach.
It is not that we have seen no change in teaching over the years. Notably, delivery systems, methods and modes of assessment and related areas have been subject to significant changes. Anthony Piña, Illinois State University’s chief online learning officer, notes that online learners surpassed 50% in 2022 and continue to rise. However, deeper changes in the nature of what we teach have progressed as technology has influenced what employers are seeking.
Building knowledge has been the mantra in higher education for many centuries. The role of the university has been to build knowledge in learners to make them “knowledgeable.” Oxford Languages and Google define knowledge most concisely as “facts, information, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject.”
The emphasis on facts and information has taken a somewhat changed role with the advent of technologies over recent decades. Notably, the World Wide Web with the advent of the first browser, Mosaic in 1993 provided instant access to unprecedented volumes of information. While familiarity with key facts and information remains paramount, the recall and synthesis of facts and information via the Web can be performed nearly as quickly and more thoroughly than the human brain in most instances. In a sense the internet has become our extended, rapid-access, personal memory. Annual global web traffic exceeded a zetabyte (ZB) for the first time in 2015. A zetabyte is 1,000 exabytes, 1 billion terabytes, or 1 trillion gigabytes. This year, it’s expected to hit 175 ZB.
More recently, we have seen a surge in professional certificates offered by higher education. As Modern Campus reports:
Every professional needs upskilling in order to maintain a competitive edge in the workforce. Keeping ahead of the latest skills and knowledge has become more crucial than ever in order to align with evolving market demands. Although traditional degree programs have long been the standard solution, certificate programs have gained popularity due to their ability to offer targeted, accelerated skill development.
However, agentic AI is just now emerging. It is different than the prompt to answer generative AI in that agentic AI can include many workforce skills in its array of tools. In fact, working and collaborating with agentic AI will require an advanced, integrated skillset as described by the Global Skills Development Council:
In the fast-paced, digitally driven world, agentic AI is at the forefront of demanding new human competencies. While intelligent agents retain a place in daily life and work, individuals should transition to acquire agentic AI skills to thrive in the new age. These skills include, but are not limited to, working with technology, thinking critically, applying ethical reasoning, and adaptive collaboration with agentic AI systems. Such agentic AI skills empower one to consciously engage in guiding and shaping AI behaviors and outcomes rather than passively receiving and adapting to them. If one has agentic AI skills, they can successfully lead businesses, education, and creative industries in applying agents for innovation and impact. As such, re-dedicating ourselves to lifelong learning and responsible use of AI may prove vital in retaining humanity at the core of intelligent decision-making and progress. Without such competencies, professionals risk being bypassed by technologies they cannot control or understand. A passive attitude creates dependency on AI outcomes without the skill to query or improve them. Adopting agentic AI competencies equips individuals with the power to drive innovation and ensure responsible AI integration in the workplace.
The higher-level skills humans will need as described by the Global Skills Development Council are different from many of the career-specific skills that universities now provide in short form certificates and certification programs. Rather, I suggest that these broad, deep skills are ones that we might best describe as “wisdom” skills. They are not vocational, but instead, deeper skills related to overall maturity and sophistication in leadership, vision and insight. They include thinking critically, thinking creatively, applying ethical reasoning, and adaptive collaboration with both humans and agentic AI.
Agentic AI can be trained for the front-line skills of many positions. However, the deeper, more advanced and more cerebral skills that integrate human contexts and leadership vision are often reflective of what we would describe as wisdom rather than mere working skills. These, I would suggest, are the nature of what we will be called upon to emphasize in our classes, certificates and degrees.
Some of these skills and practices are currently taught at universities, often through case studies at the graduate level. Integrating them into the breadth of the degree curriculum as well as certificates may be a challenge, but it is one we must accomplish in higher education. Part of the process of fully embracing and integrating AI into our society will be for we humans to upgrade our own skills to maintain our relevance and leadership in the workplace.
Has your university begun to tackle the topics related to how the institution can best provide relevant skills in a world where embodied, agentic AI is working shoulder-to-shoulder with your graduates and certificate holders? How might you initiate discussion of such topics to ensure that the university continues to lead in a forward-thinking way?
This column was originally published in Inside Higher Ed.
Collaboration empowers online education leaders with confidential benchmarking, data-driven insights, and strategic decision-making tools
WASHINGTON, D.C., October 29, 2025 — UPCEA, the online and professional education association, has announced an exclusive partnership with the International Distance Education Benchmark Project (IDEBP), a first-of-its-kind initiative designed to help higher education institutions strengthen their digital learning strategies through confidential, data-informed benchmarking and analytics.
Through this partnership, UPCEA and IDEBP will collaborate to bring advanced benchmarking tools, institutional data insights, and strategic intelligence to UPCEA member institutions, particularly Chief Online Learning Officers (COLOs), deans, and other leaders guiding online education strategy.
“COLOs and other online leaders are under increasing pressure to make data-driven decisions,” said Bob Hansen, Chief Executive Officer of UPCEA. “Our partnership with IDEBP helps to socialize the necessity for comparative data and contextual insights, which will help UPCEA members advance quality, effectiveness, and innovation in their online programs.”
A New Era of Benchmarking for Online Education
Founded and led by Kevin Shriner, Ed.D., IDEBP provides institutions with an unprecedented opportunity to benchmark key distance education performance indicators in a secure, confidential environment.
By utilizing de-identified, institution-submitted information, IDEBP allows colleges and universities to access interactive dashboards, longitudinal trends, and confidential peer comparisons that inform strategic planning, accreditation, and continuous improvement for distance education programs. Through this collaboration, all UPCEA members are encouraged to leverage complimentary access to IDEBP’s national dashboards, which visualize publicly available IPEDS data and reveal trends across the higher education landscape.
“National reporting data is helpful but lacks the context that drives meaningful decision-making,” said Kevin Shriner, Founder and Executive Director of IDEBP. “IDEBP gives institutions the ability to benchmark their performance against carefully selected peers while ensuring data confidentiality. Our partnership with UPCEA expands this capability to the leaders who are defining the future of online learning.”
Advancing Research and Data Strategy for UPCEA Members
The partnership strengthens UPCEA’s role as the go-to source for data-informed strategy and research in online and professional continuing education. The collaboration responds directly to growing demand among COLOs and institutional leaders for actionable benchmarks, ROI analysis, and strategic intelligence to guide decisions about programs, enrollment, and student success.
“Our members consistently ask for better, more actionable data to inform their strategies,” said Julie Uranis, UPCEA’s Senior Vice President for Online and Strategic Initiatives. “Through this exclusive partnership with IDEBP, UPCEA is providing the field with something truly distinctive, a secure, collaborative way to use data to tell our story, measure our impact, and shape the future of online learning.”
UPCEA Members participating in IDEBP receive:
- Confidential Peer Benchmarking: Participants can compare key performance indicators (e.g., enrollment, retention, completion) against anonymized peer groups.
- Enhanced Data Collection: IDEBP gathers de-identified, institution-specific metrics not available through national reporting systems.
- Interactive Dashboards: Participants gain access to data visualizations, longitudinal trends, and confidential analyses to support strategic decisions.
- Member Discount: UPCEA members who join IDEBP’s initial phase (2025–2028) receive a 20% discount on IDEBP membership fees.
ABOUT IDEBP
The International Distance Education Benchmark Project (IDEBP) provides higher education institutions with data-driven tools for online education benchmarking—enabling them to better understand, evaluate, and improve their distance education strategies. By combining publicly available IPEDS data with confidential, institution-submitted benchmarks, IDEBP empowers institutions to make informed decisions that strengthen student success and institutional strategy. Learn more at www.idebp.org.
ABOUT UPCEA
UPCEA is the online and professional education association. Our members continuously reinvent higher education, positively impacting millions of lives. We proudly lead and support them through cutting-edge research, professional development, networking and mentorship, conferences and seminars, and stakeholder advocacy. Our collaborative, entrepreneurial community brings together decision makers and influencers in education, industry, research, and policy to improve educational access and outcomes. Learn more at https://UPCEA.edu and follow @UPCEA on social media.
CONTACT:
Molly Nelson, UPCEA VP of Communications, [email protected]

Search behavior has evolved, and so has the path to enrollment.
Generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Google’s AI Overviews shape how people gather information, verify details, and form opinions. For higher education marketers, that means program visibility depends on showing up wherever students look for answers, not only in search results but across the expanding landscape of AI and digital discovery.
A new joint study by UPCEA and Search Influence, AI Search in Higher Education: How Prospects Search in 2025, captures how today’s prospective students search and decide. The data shows that learners now move fluidly between Google, AI platforms, and video when exploring their options online.
To reach and engage this audience, institutions must be visible and consistent across multiple channels.
About the Research Study
The 2025 AI Search in Higher Education Research Study examined how prospective students search for professional and continuing education programs in the age of AI.
The survey gathered responses from 760 adults ages 18–60, all interested in advancing their education or career. Participants represented a mix of educational backgrounds, from high school graduates through graduate degree holders, and most were employed full-time. This group reflects today’s growing market of adult learners and offers insight into broader enrollment trends.
The research explored how students use search engines, AI tools, social platforms, and other digital channels in their searches and how these behaviors influence enrollment decisions.
Here’s what the research reveals about student search trends in 2025, plus how your institution can adapt.
AI Search Has Become Mainstream

24% of students use AI-powered tools daily, 26% weekly, and 18% monthly.
Why This Matters
50% of prospects use AI tools at least weekly. If AI tools can’t find you, half your audience won’t either.
AI platforms are becoming central to how prospective students discover programs and institutions, influencing the options they explore next. The programs that surface first in responses shape what prospects believe their options are.
Without clear, accurate visibility across these tools, schools lose ground to competitors already earning space in AI-generated responses.
Tips to Adapt
Being visible in generative AI isn’t automatic. It requires content that’s structured, verifi able, and aligned with how these tools source and summarize information. Higher education institutions that pivot now will gain early traction with the prospective students using AI tools in their searches.
To adapt:
- Audit your AI presence. Use Google, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity to test queries your prospects might ask. Track how your institution is displayed (or excluded) and identify opportunities to improve relevance.
- Evaluate how competitors show up. Look at what programs, topics, or language other schools are using that prompt AI to include them in responses.
- Strengthen your site’s semantic structure. Use clear headings, entity-rich language, and schema markup to help AI tools understand and cite your content accurately.
- Make program pages citation-ready. Include credential names, outcomes, costs, and other fact-based elements that AI technology prefers when assembling responses.
Students Increasingly Trust AI for Program Research
32% of prospects have no concerns about using AI tools; 28% worry about accuracy, 7% privacy, with smaller groups citing plagiarism or environmental concerns.
Why This Matters
1 in 3 prospects trust AI tools for program research.
While some prospects express concerns about AI usage, trust in AI tools is growing fast. As that trust builds, AI-generated responses will carry even more weight in shaping perception, options, and decisions.
If your institution isn’t represented (or is misrepresented), you miss critical opportunities to increase trust early, often before a student reaches your website.
Tips to Adapt
To earn credibility in AI-generated content, your institution must be seen as a trustworthy source that’s consistent, verifiable, and worth referencing. That means aligning your content not just with what students search for, but with how AI tools evaluate and present information.
To adapt:
- Lead with authoritative content. Highlight faculty expertise, accreditation, program outcomes, and employer partnerships. These are signals of trust, both to students and to AI models sourcing content.
- Publish transparent program details. Include tuition, financial aid, admissions requirements, and FAQs. AI tools tend to favor straightforward, fact-based content when answering user queries.
- Update your content regularly. Stale or outdated information undermines trust. Make sure key pages reflect the current academic year, deadlines, and opportunities. (Bonus tip: AI favors fresh content.)
- Monitor how AI tools talk about you. Prompt Google AI, ChatGPT, and Gemini with your institution’s name and programs. If the answers are inaccurate or missing, update your web content to clarify and strengthen signals.
Google’s AI Overviews Influence Student Trust

79% of prospects read Google’s AI Overviews; 56% are more likely to trust brands cited in them.
Why This Matters
If you’re not in the AI Overview, you’re not being considered, and you’re not getting the application.
AI Overviews dominate prime screen real estate. Cited brands gain instant credibility with over half of readers. When your institution appears here, you’re not just visible… you’re validated. But if you’re missing, prospects will explore programs with universities that are present.
In a high-stakes, low-attention environment, the brands that show up first are the ones that make it into the prospect’s consideration set.
Tips to Adapt
Securing a spot in Google’s AI Overviews takes deliberate eff ort of foundational SEO tactics and more advanced AI / large language model (LLM)-focused techniques. These summaries are driven by what Google’s systems determine to be the most authoritative, structured, and clearly stated content available, and they pull from what’s easy to parse.
To adapt:
- Build authoritative content with structured data. Use schema markup, clear headers, tables of contents, key insights, and accurate facts to signal relevance and credibility. Structured pages help Google extract key points for AI-generated summaries.
- Answer questions before they’re asked. Expand FAQ sections and long-form content to address what students are likely searching for. The more precise and factual your answers, the more likely they are to be cited.
- Earn citations and backlinks that reinforce authority. Mentions from media outlets, government pages, or high-authority industry sites act as external signals of trust and improve your chances of inclusion (yes, even paid placements and awards!)
- Monitor who’s getting cited. Look at which institutions, programs, or even non-academic sites appear in AI Overviews for relevant terms. Identify content patterns, citation formats, and topic framing that you can apply or improve on.
Page One Visibility Still Drives Consideration
35% of prospects are “much more likely” to consider programs on page one of traditional search; 47% “somewhat more likely”; only 16% say no impact.
Why This Matters
82% of prospects are more likely to consider programs on page one of search results.
Page one is still the digital front door to enrollment. Even as AI tools rise in influence, traditional search results remain a primary source of program discovery. Students rarely scroll past the first few listings, and if your program isn’t visible at the top, it’s likely not being considered.
Tips to Adapt
AI search may be reshaping the landscape, but strong traditional SEO remains foundational. Your institution’s visibility in Google’s organic results is highly correlated to AI Overview visibility and directly impacts consideration and clicks for those who scroll beyond AI.
To adapt:
- Prioritize SEO for high-intent keywords. Target the terms prospective students actually use, including program names, degree levels, and career outcomes.
- Fix technical barriers. Ensure your site loads quickly, works on mobile, and meets accessibility standards so it ranks competitively and offers a frictionless experience.
- Refresh your top pages often. Keep program descriptions, outcomes, and cost details current and aligned with what students want to know. (Remember that bonus tip about fresh content? Organic search and AI favor up-to-date content.)
- Optimize for click-through. Use clear title tags, compelling meta descriptions, and structured data to earn attention and clicks from students scanning page one of search results.
Students Rely on Search Engines and University Websites
84% of prospects are extremely/very likely to use search engines for program research, and 63% are extremely/very likely to use university websites.
Why This Matters
You must invest in search and your website to stay competitive in the enrollment journey.
Search engines and university websites remain the primary tools students trust when exploring programs. Credibility is built through organic search and on-site experience. If your website is difficult to navigate or outdated, even strong rankings won’t convert.
Tips to Adapt
Success in traditional search depends on what students find when they click through. Your site and your SEO strategy must work in tandem.
To adapt:
- Keep your program pages updated and accurate. Ensure they reflect current outcomes, costs, deadlines, and credential details.
- Focus on UX alongside SEO. A well-optimized page must also load quickly, work across devices, and guide students toward action.
- Map student questions across both search and site content. Align on-page copy, meta descriptions, and internal navigation with how students search and what they want to know.
- Support SEO with strong internal linking. Connect relevant blog posts, FAQs, and related programs to help both users and search engines navigate your site effectively.
- Use analytics to identify drop-offs. If a high-ranking page isn’t converting, assess its content clarity, structure, and call-to-action strategy.
University Websites Are the Most Trusted Source
77% of prospects consider university websites as “extremely/very trustworthy,” compared to 66% for search engines.
Why This Matters
Prospects are still seeking information from university sites. They will still click sources featured in AI and go to organic results.
This makes your website your most credible enrollment tool. Invest in it.
Tips to Adapt
Trust is earned in the details. Your site should give prospects everything they need to feel confident in their next step: clear facts, authoritative signals, and an experience that reinforces credibility from the first click to the final inquiry.
To adapt:
- Build transparent, student-centered program pages. Go beyond marketing copy to include the facts students care about: tuition, modality, admissions steps, deadlines, and outcomes.
- Reinforce institutional credibility. Highlight faculty expertise, alumni outcomes, licensure rates, and employer partnerships. These proof points build trust quickly with prospects.
- Use schema markup to strengthen signals. Structured data helps search engines and AI tools extract accurate program information, reinforcing your authority in both platforms and perception.
- Show rather than tell. Include testimonials, student spotlights, and real outcomes to demonstrate value and connection, not just claim it.
Student Search Behavior Is Diversified Across Platforms
84% of prospects use search engines to research programs, and they also use AI tools (50%) and YouTube (61%) in the same way they do a search engine.
Why This Matters
Your content must perform across traditional search, AI, and video.
Students now move fluidly between Google, AI tools, YouTube, and social. Each platform serves a different purpose: quick answers, in-depth comparisons, peer validation, or visual walkthroughs.
Together, they form a research loop that shapes perception long before a student clicks “Apply.”

Tips to Adapt
Reaching today’s prospects means showing up with the right format, in the right place, at the right time. Whether they’re asking ChatGPT about career outcomes or watching a YouTube video on certificate options, your content needs to be structured for discovery and built for trust.
To adapt:
- Align content across formats. Repurpose your web content into short-form video scripts, AI-readable Q&A blocks, and traditional SEO pages that reinforce the same core message.
- Optimize YouTube strategically. Use keyword-driven titles, clear descriptions, transcripts, and organized playlists that match what students are searching for.
- Format content for AI visibility. Use semantically rich headings, structured data, and factual language that tools like Gemini and ChatGPT can easily cite.
- Test your presence across platforms. Search your institution and programs on Google, YouTube, and AI tools. Identify what appears, what’s missing, and where adjustments are needed.
Social Proof Shapes Enrollment Decisions
Nearly 7 in 10 prospects say frequent social media recommendations make them more likely to consider a product (18% “much more likely,” 50% “somewhat more likely.”)
Why This Matters
Peer-driven credibility directly influences program consideration.
Social platforms have evolved into search engines in their own right. Prospects use TikTok, Meta, and Reddit to explore programs, validate what they’ve seen on Google or AI tools, and hear real stories from real students. This growing trend in social search means your visibility in these spaces reinforces credibility and drives consideration across channels.
Institutions absent from these conversations risk losing share of voice to competitors who are consistently cited, shared, and seen.
Tips to Adapt
Social content should feel real, relevant, and shareable. You must build a presence that reflects your community, answers common questions, and encourages engagement over promotion.
To adapt:
- Post consistently with intent. Focus on timely topics, upcoming deadlines, or frequently asked questions to stay relevant in the feed.
- Use strong captions. Well-written copy can help your content surface in AI-generated search results and organic rankings.
- Optimize captions with keywords: Write optimized captions in the same way you would write a blog post to align with how prospective students search.
- Center student and alumni voices. Let your community speak to outcomes, challenges, and successes in their own words.
- Highlight real experiences through video. Short-form videos featuring students, faculty members, or behind-the-scenes moments often outperform highly produced promotional content.
AI Search in Higher Education FAQs
How is AI search different from traditional SEO?
AI search summarizes information from across the web, while traditional SEO ranks individual pages in search results. Instead of displaying a list of links, tools like ChatGPT and Google’s AI Overviews generate direct answers using the most authoritative and well-structured content available. To be included, your content needs to be factual, well-formatted, and optimized for semantic understanding, not just keyword relevance.
Can appearing in AI results actually drive enrollment inquiries?
Yes, if your program appears in AI results, you’re already in the student’s consideration set. Half of prospective students use AI tools weekly, often before they visit your website. Visibility here builds trust early, introduces your programs at the discovery stage, and directs students toward deeper engagement via your site or other channels.
What’s the risk of not adapting to AI search now?
If you’re not visible in AI-driven search, you’re not being considered. AI tools can’t surface what they can’t fi nd. Programs with weak SEO and unclear signals are often excluded from AI-generated results, even if they’re relevant. The good news: acting now puts you ahead of most institutions. Early movers will win visibility in both AI and Google, ensuring they’re found, considered, and chosen.
Turn Student Search Trends Into Enrollment Wins
The gap between how students search and how most institutions show up is widening.
While prospects move fluidly between search engines, AI, YouTube, and university sites, too many strategies are still stuck in single-channel thinking.
The new AI search research isn’t just a snapshot of behavior. It’s a wake-up call to act.
Download the AI Search in Higher Education Report from UPCEA and Search Influence to see what students expect, where your institution stands, and how to stay visible at every step of the enrollment journey.
Paula French is a Director at Search Influence, a leading AI SEO and digital marketing agency specializing in higher education. With over 15 years of experience crafting and leading digital marketing campaigns for major organizations, Paula has a proven track record of helping institutions like Tulane School of Professional Advancement effectively reach and engage their target audiences.
“How would you describe your leadership style?”
This question is a common one for both mid-level and senior-level candidates in the interview process. In the past, many relied on descriptors such as transformative, collaborative, or authentic to explain how they approached people and built teams. But as you think about your next career step, perhaps it is time to prepare for a new twist on that question: How does your leadership style intersect with artificial intelligence (AI)?
Lincoln’s Legacy of Leadership
Much of my professional career has been spent in Springfield, Illinois, the Land of Lincoln. Springfield is home to the only home Abraham Lincoln ever owned, the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum, and Oak Ridge Cemetery, where Lincoln, Mary Todd Lincoln, and three of their children are buried. Lincoln built his legal and political career in Springfield before becoming president. It was here that he honed the leadership skills that would ultimately shape history.
Many scholars have analyzed Lincoln’s leadership, noting his ability to inspire trust, delegate authority, and navigate conflict with clarity (Phillips, 1993; Goodwin, 2005; Aubrey, 2012). According to Gemini (2025), Lincoln demonstrated a transformational style through listening to diverse viewpoints, inspiring loyalty, and communicating with confidence and clarity.
What If Lincoln Had AI?
While it is always challenging to view the past through the lens of today, I posed a question to ChatGPT (2025).
Using the literature on Abraham Lincoln’s leadership, how might he have utilized artificial intelligence to complement his style?
ChatGPT’s response outlined five intriguing possibilities:
- Public opinion analysis – Using AI to analyze newspapers, correspondence, and political publications in real time. This is visually depicted by one of the most impactful exhibits at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Museum. The display represents how public opinion was shaped, and distorted, through media of the time.
- Battlefield synthesis – AI could have consolidated conflicting battlefield reports, helping Lincoln and his leadership team make clearer, more informed decisions.
- Predictive strategy – AI might have helped Lincoln anticipate outcomes more precisely.
- Communication testing – Although Lincoln was a masterful speaker, AI may have supported him by testing rhetorical strategies before he delivered them to the public.
- Empathy at scale – Social listening tools might have amplified Lincoln’s ability to understand and connect with citizens across the country.
While I don’t fully agree with all the assessments provided, I appreciated that ChatGPT also raised cautionary points about ethical risks, overreliance, and fairness. Using AI as a thought partner in examining Lincoln’s leadership was an engaging scholarly exercise.
Lessons for Today’s Leaders
So, what can we learn about our own leadership in the age of AI? How do we use these tools ethically and effectively without becoming overly reliant or unfair in application of the tool? And how do we address the modern version of that familiar interview question:
“How would you describe your leadership style in a time when AI is evolving?”
As Zarifis (2025) suggests, today’s leaders must consider how they guide both people and AI to achieve shared goals.
Here are five practices I recommend for developing a clear roadmap that integrates your leadership style with the use of artificial intelligence tools available today:
- Establish clear moral guidelines for how you and your team engage with AI.
- Put people first. Relationships and human understanding remain central.
- Understand your leadership style and how both your team and AI tools can function together.
- Avoid overreliance. AI should augment, not replace, your judgment.
- Insist on fairness. Develop and follow policies that ensure equitable use of AI.
Conclusion
Leading during the evolution of AI offers tremendous opportunity, but it also challenges us to rethink how we define success. As leaders, we must balance human values with technological tools, staying true to our principles while adapting to new realities.
So, I leave you with a question: How will you lead both your human team and your AI team members?
References
Abraham Lincoln Presidential Museum. https://www.lincolnlibraryandmuseum.com/the-museum
Aubrey, G. (2012). Lincoln’s leadership—If you want success, lead like this. Creative Team Pub.
Goodwin, D. K. (2005). Team of rivals: The political genius of Abraham Lincoln. Simon & Schuster.
Phillips, D. (1993). Lincoln on leadership. Warner Books.
Zarifis, A. (2025). Leadership with AI and trust. De Gruyter.
Vickie Cook is the Vice Chancellor for Enrollment and Retention Management and a Research Professor of Education at the University of Illinois Springfield, as well as a Strategic Advisor for UPCEA Research and Consulting. To learn more about UPCEA Research and Consulting, please contact [email protected].
There are few conferences that truly bring together such an inspiring mix of vision, innovation, and authenticity as UPCEA’s Convergence. This year, the event in Washington D.C. proved why it’s one of my favorite gatherings in the field of continuing education. The energy, the openness, and the collective drive to redefine learning for a changing world were palpable – from the early morning sessions to the hallway conversations.
While I didn’t get to see every session (as much as I wish I could!), I left with an overwhelming sense of pride in this community – one that balances ambition with collaboration and grounded curiosity. Every time I attend Convergence, I’m reminded of why we do what we do: helping learners, wherever they are, continue their educational journey with purpose and possibility.
The University of Iceland managed to implement Eduframe in just three months, an incredible feat that showcased not just technical execution but deep organizational alignment. Their success was not only about moving fast – it was about moving together. Before the project even started, Iris and Elva had already built internal commitment by making the process visible: presentations, shared timelines, open Q&A sessions, and regular staff involvement. They ensured that everyone felt part of the transformation – not as bystanders, but as contributors.
This resonated deeply with me, especially because at Convergence this year, many sessions underscored that staff buy-in is the make-or-break factor in digital transformation. The University of Iceland turned that principle into action. Their approach embodies something I often repeat: there may be massive differences between institutions worldwide, but the commonalities always outweigh them. The language, titles, or structures might differ, but the human elements – trust, communication, and shared purpose – remain the same.
Their agility also reflects what I would call the emerging “COLO mindset” – drawn from The Chief Online Learning Officer’s Guidebook by Jocelyn Widmer and Thomas Cavanagh. While Elva and Iris might not hold that exact title, they demonstrate the same core traits described in the book: adaptability, collaboration, vision, and the ability to bridge strategy and execution. In Iceland’s case, that leadership led to remarkable speed – not reckless urgency, but structured momentum.
Their golden nugget was their ability to create speed to course – building and launching courses within weeks. They embraced experimentation, accepted that around 30% of courses might never go live, and viewed that not as failure but as evidence of responsiveness. By working closely with companies, associations, and unions to understand emerging needs, they ensured every offering aligned with real workforce demand. It’s a pragmatic form of innovation – one that values progress over perfection.
What stood out was their shared emphasis on clarity. Both institutions stressed the importance of defining what terms like CLR, LER, and digital credentialing actually mean in their context. These concepts can still feel “fluffy” or abstract to many, but by articulating their institutional definitions clearly and turning those into something visual, they’re making these frameworks actionable and trusted.
UMGC and Morgan also reinforced a powerful truth: you don’t need to wait for perfection to begin. Both universities have built strong foundations for CLR and LER, but acknowledged that these systems will always evolve. The key is to start, learn, and iterate – not to stall in pursuit of an unattainable ideal. This principle mirrors the Icelandic approach: act with intention, then refine with insight.
Perhaps most importantly, both institutions highlighted that learning data – when well-structured and shared – doesn’t just serve administrators; it empowers learners. CLRs and LERs make skills visible and portable, allowing learners to present verifiable evidence of what they know and can do. This shift ties directly to the growing movement toward skills-based hiring and Prior Learning Assessment (PLA) – areas that bridge academia and the workforce more closely than ever.
Institutions like the University of Iceland, UMGC, and Morgan State exemplify what happens when universities build living bridges to the workforce. They design courses with employers, recognize informal learning through PLA, and create records that travel beyond institutional walls. This responsiveness is not just operational agility – it’s a moral imperative. Learners deserve systems that keep pace with the realities of modern work.
During my own Industry Insights session at Convergence, I shared how these global trends are unfolding across institutions we work with worldwide – from Europe to North America and beyond. What struck me most is that while every context is unique, the underlying drivers are the same: agility, clarity, and the ability to connect learning to employability. The discussions reinforced that continuing education isn’t an afterthought anymore; it’s becoming the blueprint for how institutions adapt to lifelong learning at scale.
As one speaker put it beautifully, “Lifelong learning is no longer a slogan – it’s the infrastructure of employability.” I couldn’t agree more.
At Drieam, we see this every day: when institutions reduce the time between course design and course launch, they’re not simply increasing efficiency – they’re creating access. Learners can engage faster, apply new skills sooner, and (re-)enter the workforce with momentum. Clean, connected data systems make that possible. And that’s where technology, when done right, becomes an enabler of transformation rather than an obstacle.
Too often, systems are designed around technology rather than pedagogy. But when technology enables purpose – when it strengthens relationships, simplifies workflows, and supports the learner’s journey – transformation accelerates. The partnership model between universities and EdTech providers has to reflect that shared accountability.
Even among those who don’t carry formal COLO titles, the mindset is there: leaders who build bridges between innovation and implementation, between institutional tradition and future possibility. That’s where the true evolution of continuing education lies – in the hands of those who dare to experiment, reflect, and share their lessons openly.
Looking Ahead
As we look toward the UPCEA Annual Conference in April 2026 in New Orleans, I can’t wait to see how these conversations continue to evolve, and what new collaborations and innovations will emerge.
In the meantime, I’m excited about our upcoming webinar series, featuring insights from the University of Iceland and Jones College’s Online Workforce College, with another speaker to be announced soon. These sessions continue what Convergence began: sharing perspectives across borders, learning from one another, and reminding ourselves that while the contexts may differ, the mission remains the same – to make learning accessible, relevant, and transformative.
For those who attended Convergence, it was wonderful connecting in person – whether during sessions, in the hallways, or at the familiar blue Eduframe booth. Those conversations are what make this community so strong: open, curious, and deeply committed to improving education together.
Because in the end, the future of learning is not just about technology or policy.
It’s about people – and the collective willingness to keep leading, adapting, and learning together.
We have begun a transformation in higher education that will make us more responsive, efficient, and effective at achieving our multiple missions. This will not be easy or without trauma, but it is necessary.
I had the honor and good fortune to be invited by the generous and insightful Board Chair of the International Professors Project, Sriprya Sarathy, to speak via Zoom to the Re-think AI conference, sponsored in part by the International Academy of Science, Technology, Engineering and Management (IASTEM) and hosted by the ICLED Business School in Lagos, Nigeria. The conference brought together thought leaders, researchers, innovators, and industry professionals to explore how Artificial Intelligence and Digital Transformation are reshaping businesses, societies, and the future of humanity. The conference prompted me to consider how the many forces now at play in the academy and society at large are propelling us in higher education into a comprehensive transformation that is built upon Artificial Intelligence (AI). This column includes portions of a presentation I made at that conference.
The recent UPCEA and Education Dynamics report, “Marketing and Enrollment Management AI Readiness Report 2025,” makes a powerful case: AI is no longer a peripheral advantage but a non-negotiable necessity for survival and growth. The report warns that a significant gap persists between optimism about AI and operational readiness. Institutions that delay adoption risk being left permanently behind.
To build this new future, we must first “rethink” the very foundations of our institutions. This is not about adding a few new apps to the learning management system. Rather, it’s about a fundamental re-architecture of how we operate, how we teach, and how we define the work of our faculty and students. Key factors include institutional strategy, pedagogy, and the future of work.
For years, higher education has been facing existential headwinds: the much discussed “demographic cliff” that is just now arriving, a steady decline over the past several years in public confidence and falling enrollments. In this context, unfortunately many in higher education responded with concerns about how students might use AI to take unfair advantage of outdated pedagogy in their classes. Instead of pressing ahead in implementing the best available features of AI, many institutions were stalled in unfruitful debating how to best regulate the use of the technology. This shortsightedness delayed action in developing aggressive plans to make the most of the technology to advance the institution and its learners. We must provide affordable access to learning opportunities. In doing so, we will utilize the power of AI to help teach, assess and advise students at all levels.
Instead of limiting the use of AI in classes, we must rethink our pedagogy. For example, for centuries the dream of a personal tutor for every student, the Socratic ideal, was an economic and logistical impossibility. We settled for the one-to-many lecture model as a necessary compromise. That compromise is now obsolete. We can now envision, and build, a future where every student has a 24/7 AI tutor. This intelligent assistant can adapt to their individual learning pace, explain complex concepts using multiple analogies, generate infinite practice problems, and provide instant, formative feedback. This technology finally allows us to democratize mastery-based learning at scale. Imagine classes in which, by definition, everyone masters the material! This will require re-thinking the semester-based system, in favor of an outcomes-based system. Students conclude classes when they actually master the material, rather than after an arbitrary number of weeks.
Our implementation of AI is rapidly evolving from generative, systems that create content in response to prompts, to agentic systems that can autonomously perform complex, multi-step tasks. Instead of the transactional question-generative response approach, agentic AI is one in which a goal or outcome is set for which AI develops a plan, conducts research, implements actions and accomplishes the desired goal or outcome. As one of my recent columns noted, 2025 is the year this “hurricane of change” truly makes landfall.
Agentic AI will fundamentally redefine the roles of both students and faculty. An AI agent can act as a profoundly sophisticated research assistant, capable of analyzing vast datasets, summarizing entire fields of literature, test hypotheses by designing experiments and comparing curricula across institutions. This is not automation replacing intellect, but augmentation amplifying it. This shift elevates human work, freeing our finite cognitive resources for what is most expertly human: creativity, critical insight, and ethical judgment.
This comprehensive transformation can be visualized as a shift across all core university functions. In my June 2025 column, “Walking, Talking, Engaging AI in Higher Ed,” I explored this coming revolution as embodied AI (intelligent robots) come to campuses. I ask you to join me on a brief tour of a university campus in the year 2030.
Imagine walking into the library. Instead of a single, overwhelmed librarian, you are greeted by several humanoid assistants. They don’t just answer your questions; they can access vast databases in real-time, physically retrieve books from the stacks, and guide you through complex archival systems. Overnight, these tireless assistants re-shelve every book, ensuring the library is perfectly organized each morning, ready for a new day of discovery.
Now, let’s visit the science labs. Behind a protective barrier, an embodied AI assistant, impervious to hazardous materials, conducts a delicate chemistry experiment with superhuman precision. Students observe safely via high-resolution monitors, asking the AI questions in real-time and directing it to repeat or modify steps. They can, actually see through the cameras, in the robot’s eye sockets get a point-of-view vision. This opens up entirely new possibilities for safe, repeatable, and complex demonstrations that were previously too dangerous or expensive to conduct regularly.
Finally, consider student services. An embodied AI acts as a campus guide, providing multilingual support to international students and visitors 24/7. Another is programmed as a first responder for mental wellness crises, able to detect physiological and verbal signs of distress, provide immediate, calming support, and discreetly alert human professionals. This is not a dystopian replacement of people but a strategic augmentation. Embodied AI handles the repetitive, the dangerous, and the round-the-clock tasks, freeing up our human staff for more complex, empathetic, and creative roles. This allows us to address budget constraints while simultaneously improving the quality and availability of student services.
In sum, by 2030 we will be approaching what I would call the synergetic campus. This is a campus in which embodied AI robots join human faculty, staff and administrators in addressing the needs and wants of the learners. It is synergetic in the evolving of many human physical and intellectual capabilities in these robots and the collaboration of missions pursued by both. The cost of these robots will be far less than current salaries and indirect costs per staff member. The productivity of these embodied AI units will be round the clock, seven days a week. They will expand capabilities, lower costs and improve efficiency.
Who is leading the planning for this major transition on your campus in the coming few years? What will these changes mean for you in your position? Are you adequately preparing to support these changes that will make your institution relevant and viable in the future?
This column was originally published in Inside Higher Ed.
Half of prospective students use AI tools weekly, and early-adopting institutions stand to gain in enrollment visibility.
NEW ORLEANS, La., October 13, 2025 – 50 percent of prospective students now use AI-powered search tools at least weekly, making artificial intelligence a critical first step in discovering and evaluating higher education programs. The 2025 AI Search in Higher Education Research Study, conducted by UPCEA, the Online and Professional Education Association, and higher education SEO agency Search Influence, reveals how AI, traditional search engines, and university websites shape the student decision-making journey.
Although AI use is on the rise, student trust still favors direct information from traditional search engines and university websites. In total, 77 percent of respondents consider university websites the most reliable source, while AI tools and other platforms are gaining credibility; 79 percent read Google’s AI-generated overviews, and 56 percent are more likely to trust institutions cited in them. Institutions that optimize for AI-driven search can capture attention early and connect prospects with trusted content, gaining a competitive edge.
Other key findings from the research include:
- Page one still matters: 82 percent of prospects are more likely to consider programs that appear on the first page of results.
- Search is diversifying: 84 percent use search engines, 61 percent use YouTube, and 50 percent use AI tools as they would Google.
- AI credibility is rising: 32 per cent of prospects trust AI tools for program research
“These findings confirm what we see every day. Without visibility in AI search, institutions risk being overlooked,” said Paula French, director at AI SEO agency Search Influence. “Strong SEO and AI-focused strategies are the connective tissue linking prospects from search results to trusted university websites and, ultimately, to enrollment decisions.”
“This research shows that AI-powered search is transforming how students discover programs and rewriting the enrollment playbook,” added Bruce Etter, senior director of research and consulting at UPCEA. “Colleges and universities that adapt their visibility and messaging to this shift will be the ones that succeed in connecting with the next generation of learners, which is imperative as more institutions view online education as the avenue to balancing institutional books.”
The study was conducted in March 2025 and surveyed 760 qualified adults between the ages of 18 and 60. Participants represented diverse educational and employment backgrounds, making the results broadly applicable to institutions focused on adult learners.
The release of this research comes at a pivotal time for higher education marketers. As students move fluidly between AI platforms, search engines, and video-based resources such as YouTube, institutions must ensure their content performs across platforms, so their programs appear where prospects search most often.
The 2025 AI Search in Higher Education Research Study is now available to download. A companion webinar on October 23 and a series of AI Search Strategy Labs (October 28 and 30) will offer additional insights and tactical recommendations. Registration details are available here.
About Search Influence:
Search Influence is an AI SEO-focused higher education digital marketing agency that helps institutions drive prospects into and through the recruitment funnel with analytics-backed strategies, including organic and AI SEO and paid digital advertising. Founded in 2006, Search Influence’s core purpose is to optimize potential. The agency collaborates with institutions nationally and in its home city of New Orleans. Clients include: Tulane University, Tufts University College, LSU Online & Continuing Ed, and Maine College of Art & Design. Search Influence experts frequently speak at higher ed and industry conferences, and the agency’s work has earned recognition from the US Search Awards, US Agency Awards, and Inc. 5000.
About UPCEA:
UPCEA is the online and professional education association. Its members continuously reinvent higher education, positively impacting millions of lives. The association proudly leads and supports them through cutting-edge research, professional development, networking and mentorship, conferences and seminars, and stakeholder advocacy. Its collaborative, entrepreneurial community brings together decision makers and influencers in education, industry, research, and policy interested in improving educational access and outcomes.
Shifting Student and Employer Priorities Create Opportunities for Higher Education
Interest and innovation in workforce-related programming and credentials continue to surge, emerging as one of the fastest growing markets in higher education. Two-thirds of colleges and universities are making significant investments in this area, with more than one-third also embedding professional certifications into their online degree and nondegree programming Emerging research by the Rutgers Education and Employment Research Center (EERC) is demonstrating that learners eager to grow their career favor targeted workforce programs. Nearly three out of four adults without degrees say that industry certifications are “very” or “extremely” valuable.
A 2023 study by UPCEA and Collegis Education found that employers have a strong interest in engaging with higher education institutions to develop and deliver non-degree credentials, citing the quality of the content from institutions.
With strong interest from students and employers, what is keeping institutions from capitalizing on this opportunity? First and foremost, higher education institutions are not known for their agility or prowess in cultivating university to business relationships. Often institutions get in their own way with a lack of strategic vision and purpose around engaging employers holistically. In addition, the space of workforce training and non-degree credentials requires institutions to adopt a demand-driven approach to program identification and development versus the more common supply-driven model of faculty driving program suggestions. To achieve success, institutions must take a strategic approach, considering both student and employer perspectives over a much broader timeline, recognizing that learners will need upskilling and reskilling throughout their career.
Maximizing Audience Lifetime Value
Institutions have historically focused on more traditional learners but with the shifting demographics of today’s learner, this focus must expand to consider learners across a continuum. In fact, the lines between traditional and non-traditional students have blurred over the past several years to the point where age is no longer a predictor of preferred learning pathway. According to a 2025 study of the Modern Learner conducted by EducationDynamics, nearly half (47%) of students enrolled in classroom programs considered fully online program options and an astounding 59% of online undergraduate students would consider classroom programs. These students are motivated by multiple factors, led by cost and the return on their investment.
Institutions must view students not as one-time enrollees but as lifelong learners and advocates. This is a new concept in higher education but is commonplace in business. Institutions must define “audience lifetime value” and consider learner needs at various phases of their educational journey. Learners are seeking opportunities to build their skills throughout their career. Even the traditional undergraduate student is seeking opportunities to demonstrate skills and knowledge that will allow them to stand apart in the job market upon graduation. As their career progresses, students will be seeking opportunities to upskill and reskill to help with upward mobility. This is particularly true when talking about students enrolled in credential programs; 82% of whom intend to re-enroll in future programs and apply their current studies to future credentials.
Institutions have an opportunity to strategically engage learners beyond a single credential, by deliberately designing programs to help students to “learn and earn” throughout their lifetime. This includes offering credentialing opportunities to existing students while developing continuing education programs to attract new learners and to bring students back as they progress in their career. Providing upskilling and stackable credential pathways focused on building necessary skills will provide on and off-ramps as needed. Engaging employers and alumni in the design of these programs will ensure relevance, reinforce the institutional brand, and signal quality. Offering alumni discounts and/or other exclusive offers will provide value and help to ensure they continue to return.
Leverage Institutional Reputation
Leveraging institutional reputation may sound simple when in reality, it requires a disciplined approach to market evaluation, recognition of the institution’s unique strengths, and a commitment to serving the nearby community.
It is critically important to align credential offerings with institutional mission and areas of expertise. What is your institution known for? What draws students to your programs? What do your alumni do upon graduation? Answering these questions is critical to maximizing the value of your brand. All too often institutions consider developing programs in “hot” areas when they do not align to their strengths.
Institutions must use labor market data and employer feedback to shape programs. Labor market data is available through free sources such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics and paid sources such as Lightcast. A combination of tools will provide foundational data on skills gaps in the workplace and emerging careers.
Geography plays a key role as well. Local schools own their local markets – most students enroll at schools within 50 miles of campus. This is even more relevant for credential students and those that may be returning for repeat engagement. As you conduct market analysis, it is important to consider the regions currently being served and those you wish to serve in the future. Brand awareness will be greatest in your region and learners are drawn to institutions that are close by, even if they never attend classes on campus.
Leveraging Alumni Networks in Credential Design
We work with numerous member institutions and consistently find that alumni are not being engaged in program planning. There are many reasons for this, primarily that Alumni and Engagement offices play a key role in outreach and want to ensure that alumni are not inundated with outreach. However, by playing that gatekeeping role, those offices often exclude the offices of online and professional continuing education from connecting with alumni and offering an opportunity for alumni to help shape program offerings.
Alumni are your institution’s greatest brand ambassadors. Alumnae are proud of their alma mater, and want to give back in ways beyond donating. There are several key ways to engage your alumni to ensure credential success.
- Ask alumni for their input. Alumni are not only loyal to the institution, they are working professionals with needs for continuous learning for career mobility. Additionally, they are often in leadership positions, managing teams of people that also need professional development and skill building. Alumni are uniquely positioned to provide valuable insights to help shape program offerings.
- Leverage alumni to promote credential programs and attract learners. Ask them for testimonials and to tell their personal stories, highlighting how the institution has helped them along their educational journey. Establish alumni referral programs and/or discounts for alumni to encourage participation in credential programs.
- Consider co-branded initiatives with alumni as employer partners. Alumni have a tremendous amount of credibility because they speak from their personal experience. That can help to reinforce the quality of your credential offerings and build trust in your programs.
The Impact of Corporate Partnerships on Revenue and Reputation
Institutional partnerships with employers can drive enrollment and build credibility. As noted, employers want to be included in the design of credential programs. They have first-hand insight into the skills needed by their workforce and involving them in designing courses and programs will ensure that their needs will be met by the program.
For the institution, partnerships such as these help us to grow our learner audience while we also strengthen the relationship with the employer partner. This also helps to ensure that there is demand from learners for the program. Employers that are actively engaged are committed to having their employees complete the program. This helps to ensure revenue to off-set development costs and allows the institution to gain valuable insights into ways to attract other learners.
Employers benefit from programming that is aligned to their unique needs. They have confidence that their employees will gain the necessary skills and this helps to ensure they receive a return on the investment in training.
Another positive impact of these partnerships is that they push institutions to be more agile and responsive. Employers provide the budget that institutions often need to move more quickly to respond to the rapidly changing needs of the workforce. Employers simply cannot wait for institutions to follow traditional program development timelines of months to years. They need upskilling and reskilling to be just-in-time.
Lastly, prominently featuring employer partnerships builds institutional reputation. These partnerships highlight the innovation and focus for the institution, while demonstrating the employer’s commitment to development of their workforce. The partnerships help to attract other employers who may be seeking targeted skill development for their employees as well. It is truly a win-win for both.
The University of South Florida shared an interesting case study about their successful turnaround of their continuing education unit into a revenue generating part of the institution. A key part of their strategy was focusing on the workforce needs in their region and partnering with key employers to develop targeted, skills-based training.
Marketing Strategy/Recommendations
While recruiting career focused students can leverage many of the same strategies and tactics regardless of the type of credential, there are some special considerations for marketing to students considering credential programs. Perhaps the most important consideration is where to invest to maximize your return on investment. With a lower average lifetime value cost per enrollment, credential programs can’t afford to waste limited advertising dollars on ineffective and inefficient marketing strategies.
Invest in brand awareness
Students pursuing enrollment in credential programs emphasize the same factors that appeal to all Modern Learners: cost, career outcomes and convenience. Students today turn to the brands they trust more than ever, and a majority (58%) begin their search at the institutional level, even before they search for programs. This makes brand awareness not only an efficient use of your limited advertising budget, but also a critical channel to your success.
Discoverability is Key and your website remains the hub of your brand
49% begin their search on Google or a similar search engine, while another 27% turn directly to your website. In an era of rapidly shifting online behavior, this means your website and web presence is more critical than ever. Your website is your most critical marketing asset and the hub of your brand.
The Search Engine Results Page (SERP) experience has dramatically changed in 2025, and will continue to evolve as AI-generated responses become more prevalent. While total traffic has declined for most websites, a website that simply exists as an online brochure is a missed marketing opportunity. Traditional SEO, while foundational, falls short of delivering in an online ecosystem where the rules are being rewritten almost constantly. Offering multiple engagement and communication channels through your website, including live chat, AI-powered chatbots, forms and video, provides your visitors options and opportunities to engage on their terms. Credential students are often also working professionals, meaning they are searching for and researching programs outside of your (and their) normal working hours. Your website and related resources are powerful tools that work while you aren’t.
There is another key new audience that you must now address: the AI agents that are delivering results and information that users would previously search over multiple websites. These agents are delivering information on your brand and program in platform – be that in the SERP experience via AI Mode or Search Generative Experience, or within the chatbots themselves. Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is a critical strategic imperative that you cannot afford to ignore. Your website serves as a critical source of information for answer engines like Chat-GPT, Google Gemini and Perplexity and your strategy should include serving this new important audience. When a future student turns to Chat-GPT to learn more about career-advancing education, you want to be a source of information driving the answer results. Go ahead and turn to your AI agent of choice and ask it about advancing a career related to your credential program of choice and you’ll see the power of GEO.
Digital Advertising has Evolved
The world of paid search advertising has been transformed by AI user experiences and AI-powered advertising tools that are being built into advertising platforms. In this new reality, search is no longer only a tool to generate leads, it is a reputation and visibility builder as well. The lines between paid and organic search are blurred and the two cannot operate in silos. Legacy paid search strategies hyper-focused on narrow and isolated keywords are outdated and fail to capitalize on the nuanced triggers uncovered by the latest AI-driven campaigns. Evolving your campaign strategy from a list of keywords and narrow ad placements elevates this critical channel to one that both influences and capitalizes on brand visibility while also driving enrollments.
Continue to Nurture and Engage Your Audience
We tend to think of a CRM as a piece of software that we purchase and use to store student data, but to effectively market credential programs, you need the right strategy, processes and staff to leverage your data and engage prospective students. If you have earned your way into a prospective student’s consideration set (or better yet, have a prior relationship with a returning student) you have already done the hard part. Email remains the gold standard for communication, along with telephone and text messaging. Effective CRM database marketing requires personalized messaging that delivers the right message at the right time. Prospective credential students are likely to care deeply about career outcomes and return on investment, but they also want to know that you know them. Segmentation strategies that leverage demographic data like alumni status, career role and employer build trust, while delivering deeper information based on behaviors help inform and overcome objections before they are raised.
Measuring the Metrics that Matter
For all the promise of credential programs, there are no guarantees of success. Continuously monitoring, managing and optimizing based on metrics that matter will give you, and your students, the best chance at success. We recommend focusing on a few key performance indicators and avoiding the vanity metrics that show a lot of activity, but do little to deliver insights that improve outcomes. These metrics should be compared regularly against both historic data within programs and against other similar credential programs rather than against legacy academic programs.
- Student Metrics – Evaluate your program first on student-driven metrics like completion rate, enrollment rates and lead-to-enrollment rates. If you have a low or flagging program completion rate in relatively short credential programs, it is likely that the students are losing belief that the program is delivering the learning outcomes required for their desired career outcomes. Meanwhile, a low lead or inquiry-to-enrollment ratio suggests that you have a leaky enrollment funnel. There is a disconnect between your initial marketing promise and the follow up messaging. This could be because you are bringing poorly matched prospects into the funnel or you are not communicating the program value to highly qualified candidates.
- Constituent Metrics – Particularly for credential programs, your audience extends well beyond the students enrolled in your program. It is critical that you pay attention to and respond to metrics around employer satisfaction and endorsement rates and alumni engagement rates. While there may be many reasons employers pull enrollments, slowing enrollment from an employer (or employer pool) may be an early sign that they may not value. Similarly, alumni engagement is an excellent indicator of social proof and the strength of a program’s reputation.
- Financial Metrics – Credential programs operate on tight margins that require optimal resource allocation. Primary among those resources are financial and human capital. Closely monitor your return on investment at the marketing and program level. However, guard against the temptation to measure marketing ROI at a channel level and instead consider your entire marketing mix from brand awareness to inquiry generation and enrollment. Placing too much emphasis in inquiry and enrollment attribution at the channel level risks undervaluing critical brand and reputation-building activities and channels.
Your KPIs related to human capital in the form of program managers and instructors are among your most critical. These costs may be fixed in the short term, and those allocated differently in a program break-even analysis. However, the indirect and hidden opportunity costs of managing and teaching under-utilized programs weigh down performance of your entire program portfolio. The nature of credential programs allow for rapid reallocation of resources to higher performing programs that are delivering outcomes the market demands.
Conclusion
In an era where credentials are increasingly abundant, standing out requires more than just delivering quality education, it demands thoughtful marketing and powerful partnerships. By aligning your credential offerings with clear market needs, communicating their value proposition effectively, and aligning with your institution’s brand, you don’t just raise awareness, you multiply impact.
- Invest in data and storytelling to show how your credentials pay off—for learners, for employers, and for your institution.
- Don’t go it alone: partnerships with industry, community organizations, and employers can extend your reach, enhance credibility, and unlock new pathways for learners.
- Be intentional about consistency: branding, messaging, and delivery should reinforce each other, building trust over time.
- Finally, measure what matters. Track outcomes—not just enrollments but employability, skills attainment, and long-term value—and let those metrics guide future strategy.
In short, maximizing credential value is a journey, not a checkbox. With the right strategy, you can ensure your credentials don’t just exist—they lead, influence, and endure.
Eric McGee is the Senior Director of Marketing & Corporate Communication for EducationDynamics. Prior to joining EducationDynamics, he spent 12 years in various positions in higher education, including positions in higher education consulting, edtech organizations, and as the Director of Continuing & Professional Education at University of South Carolina. To learn more about EducationDynamics, contact [email protected].
Stacy Chiaramonte is the Senior Vice President of Operations and Strategy for UPCEA’s Research & Consulting division. Prior to joining UPCEA, she spent 13 years at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, most recently as the Associate Vice President of Graduate and Professional Studies. To learn more about UPCEA, contact [email protected].
Innovation attracts attention, and not all of it good. Protecting data, students, and credibility now means securing every AI experiment before it secures you.
The Bright Side, and the Blind Spots, of AI in Higher Ed
AI is higher ed’s new favorite partner and, like any power couple, it comes with complications. It’s rewriting essays, running analytics, personalizing lessons, and wowing leadership with shiny dashboards.
But every plug-in, pilot, and partnership adds one more crack in the wall. Student data now flows through tools few people fully understand, let alone control. The question isn’t should we use AI? It’s do we even know where it’s being used and what it’s exposing?
When “Smart” Gets Shady: Deepfakes, Data Leaks, and AI-Assisted Misconduct
Remember when plagiarism was about copying text? Cute. Now, students can clone their writing voice or their actual voice. Deepfakes blur truth itself, and “authentic” work can be faked in seconds.
This isn’t academic dishonesty anymore. It’s identity theft wrapped in a term paper. When the boundaries between student and system blur, institutions must decide what they really mean by integrity and whether their policies can survive an AI arms race.
AI vs. AI: Fighting Fire with Fire on the Cyber Frontier
AI is also the best weapon we’ve ever had for defense. It can spot phishing attacks faster than any human, trace anomalies no one would notice, and predict threats before they land.
But let’s not kid ourselves: AI makes mistakes, too. It can lock down legitimate users, misread behavior, or turn bias into policy. Automation without oversight is just faster failure. If you’re going to let AI guard the gates, you’d better be sure it’s not opening them too.
The Human Firewall: Because Every Breach Starts with a Click
Every breach starts with a click and usually not a smart one. Faculty and staff remain the easiest targets, because most haven’t been trained to spot a deepfake dean or a chatbot pretending to be IT support.
You can’t secure a campus with software alone. People need to understand the game they’re in. The real firewall is human awareness, not another security subscription.
Innovation Without Exposure: Moving Fast Without Breaking Trust
Innovation isn’t optional. But neither is responsibility. Campuses that rush to “AI-enable everything” without building governance, policy, and accountability frameworks will learn the hard way that trust, once lost, doesn’t reboot.
AI and cybersecurity have moved in together. The question now is whether campus leadership can keep the relationship healthy, or watch innovation sleep with the enemy
Jeff Angle is Head of Academic Partnerships at ISACA. These ideas were presented at the 2025 Convergence conference, with George Washington University and the National CyberWatch Center.
About ISACA
ISACA helps colleges and universities embed globally recognized IT credential content into IS, IT, and non-IT degree programs. With credential-ready curriculum, built-in support, and global credibility, ISACA’s Academic Partnerships help institutions prepare students for careers, not just graduation. Learn more at ISACA Academic Partnerships.
