Major Updates

  • US Department of Education Seeks Input on How to Reduce Reporting Burdens
    Comment Deadline: August 14

    “The U.S. Department of Education (Department) is seeking comments from the public on how it can reduce the burden associated with its information collection requests (ICRs) on State, local, territorial, and Tribal governments, educational institutions, nonprofits, and individuals, while maintaining data, information, and analyses critical to fulfill the Department’s mission. This effort will help the Department identify improvements, redundancies in information collections, and inefficiencies in collections in order to improve the value and use of data.”

    The Department is specifically asking the following questions:

    • (1) Do some Department information collections or processes place a more significant burden on certain types of respondents, particularly individuals and entities that could be more adversely affected? If so, what impact could this have on these respondents in accessing public benefits?
    • (2) Do some Department information collection requests contain questions that the commenter might perceive as having limited value or utility? If so, please identify specific data elements when recommending burden reduction solutions.
    • (3) Do some Department information collections request duplicative information? If so, please recommend solutions (for example, eliminating duplicative questions in a specific collection or consolidating multiple collections)?
    • (4) What data-linkage or data-sharing activities can the Department engage in to reduce the burden of information collections?
    • (5) The Department recognizes that burden can be reduced by improving the usability of forms. How might the Department reduce burden by improving the usability of forms, independent of eliminating data collections or data elements?
    • (6) What additional feedback would you like to share regarding challenges, barriers, or suggested improvements for obtaining benefits from the Department?

Read more and comment by August 14.

 

  • Navigating the Shifting DEI Tides: Key Policy and Judicial Developments in Higher Education
    Webinar | August 16 @ 2-3PM ET

    Join us for an engaging webinar that delves into the significant policy and judicial changes shaping diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in higher education. This session will explore the Supreme Court’s recent decision on affirmative action, shed light on states’ legislation concerning DEI initiatives, and provide invaluable insights into the evolving landscape of DEI programming at educational institutions. From administrators to faculty, this webinar will equip you with the knowledge and considerations necessary to navigate these changes effectively. Discover the latest developments, gain practical strategies, and foster inclusive learning environments while considering legal compliance. 

      • Ishan Bhabha, Partner, Jenner & Block LLP
    • Moderator: Jordan DiMaggio, Vice President, Policy + Digital Strategy UPCEA 

Register for this webinar

 

Other News

 

6 Individuals Receive Honors

MADISON, WI (July 26, 2023) – UPCEA, the online and professional education association, is pleased to recognize the recipients of this year’s awards, presented at the Distance Teaching & Learning (DT&L) Conference and Summit for Online Leadership and Administration (SOLA+R). 

Award recipients were honored today at the DT&L and SOLA+R conference in Madison, Wisconsin. Paired for the first time this July 25-27, DT&L and SOLA+R bring together all the elements of the online enterprise in a holistic way for a comprehensive learning experience.

“I’m proud to celebrate the work and achievements in online education demonstrated by all of this year’s award recipients,” said Bob Hansen, CEO of UPCEA. “I want to particularly recognize Ray Schroeder. Ray is the most prescient thinker I know, in any field, always helping others understand a future that sometimes only he sees, and he is so deserving of this award.” 

The recipients of this year’s awards are as follows:

UPCEA Leadership Award for the Advancement of Digital Learning

The UPCEA Leadership Award for the Advancement of Digital Learning recognizes the lifetime achievements and professionalism of online and digital learning practitioners. Awardees have had long and distinguished careers, advancing the cause of online and digital learning in postsecondary education. Award recipients have elevated the field, advanced scholarship, demonstrated intellectual curiosity, and embodied a pioneering spirit, through both academic and more publicly available publications, research, advocacy, and mentorship. The award is not necessarily given each year. Future awards will be known as the Ray Schroeder Leadership Award for the Advancement of Digital Learning, in honor of this year’s inaugural award recipient. 

Recipient: Ray Schroeder, UPCEA Senior Fellow & University of Illinois Springfield Professor Emeritus

 

Shauna Schullo Award for Best Distance Teaching Practices

Between 2007 and 2009, Shauna Schullo was the Director of the Distance Education Certificate Program at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, as well as the Workshop Chair for the 2009 Distance Teaching & Learning Conference. After we lost Shauna to breast cancer in 2009, the Schullo Award for Best Distance Teaching Practices was created, which recognizes DT&L presenters whose sessions contribute significantly to the practice of distance education.

The Schullo Award recipient is selected from the presentations given at the prior year’s Distance Teaching & Learning conference. 

Recipients: “Ditching Surveillance Technology & Learning to Trust Our Students,” Lea Wood and Kari Lane, University of Missouri

 

UPCEA Outstanding Service in Postsecondary Instructional Design

Instructional Design is necessary for the development of engaging quality teaching and learning experiences across a wide variety of modalities and contexts. The UPCEA Outstanding Service in Postsecondary Instructional Design Award recognizes outstanding service to the field of instructional design in one or more of the following areas: modeling and disseminating research (via workshops, webinars, conferences, papers, etc.), best practices, innovative methods, and/or mentorship, all for the betterment of the instructional design community. This award celebrates the connective power of instructional design professionals within the learning design process, chiefly their role in highlighting the critical need for educators of all roles to work in partnership in support of student success.

The UPCEA Outstanding Service in Postsecondary Instructional Design Award is part of UPCEA’s Association Awards program. Nominations for Association Awards are accepted in October/November, and recipients are selected and notified in February.  

Recipient: Holly Fiock, Purdue University

 

The Mildred B. and Charles A. Wedemeyer Award for Outstanding Writer/Scholar in Distance Education

The Mildred B. and Charles A. Wedemeyer Award for Outstanding Writer/Scholar in Distance Education honors those who build on the legacy of pioneers in the distance-education field. The award honors Professor Charles Wedemeyer—scholar, researcher and distance education innovator—who led a distinguished career at the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the Department of Continuing and Vocational Education. A scholar before his time, Dr. Wedemeyer recognized the strengths of multimedia approaches and helped others to see how media attributes could be assessed and utilized to maximize learning outcomes.

The award also carries the name of his life partner, Mildred. While Charles wanted to recognize outstanding distance-education scholars, based on contributions to the research literature in the field of distance education and training, Mildred believed that practitioners also deserved recognition. For this reason, the award has a dual focus, recognizing in alternate years outstanding distance education scholars and practitioners. This year’s award is focused on research and scholarship, and was selected by the editorial team of the American Journal of Distance Education from authors published in the journal whose work significantly advances the discipline of distance education. Wedemeyer Award recipients receive a modest honorarium, processed by the University of Wisconsin-Madison, from the Wedemeyer endowment.

Recipients: Liane She, Stanly Community College & Florence Martin, North Carolina State University – Systematic Review (2000 to 2021) of Online Accessibility Research in Higher Education AJDE 36-4

 

# # #

About UPCEA

UPCEA is the online and professional education association. Our members positively impact millions of lives by continuously reinventing higher education. We advance the professional field through cutting edge research, professional development, networking and mentorship, conferences and seminars, and stakeholder advocacy. Our collaborative, entrepreneurial community brings together decision makers and influencers in education, industry, research, and policy interested in improving educational access and outcomes. Learn more about us at UPCEA.edu and follow us on Twitter @UPCEA.

 

 

 

CONTACT:

 

Molly Nelson, UPCEA Vice President of Communications, [email protected] 

How to establish successful corporate partnerships

Corporate learning partnerships are effective revenue generators for many higher education institutions. These partnerships can also help schools better serve their missions by expanding access to higher education for adult learners. But developing successful higher education marketing initiatives to establish relationships with corporate partners can be challenging.

At MindMax, we’ve spent years honing our approach to helping schools effectively market to not only prospective students but also businesses they’re targeting for corporate partnerships. In this two-part series, we’ll share some of our key insights and recommendations for developing these partnerships.

Know Thyself

One of our core values at MindMax is to be mission-aligned—or, as I like to say: “Know thyself.” In our experience, even programs that generate significant revenue are difficult to sustain if they aren’t aligned with the school’s mission.

Schools that let their missions guide them in considering why a corporate learning initiative is important are most likely to get their efforts off the ground and enjoy long-term success.

Begin by asking these questions:

  • What is your mission, and why is it important to you?
  • What problem are you trying to solve? (Another way to look at this is: What opportunity are you trying to address?)
  • Why are you qualified to solve this problem or address this opportunity?
  • How do you get the marketplace to see you as qualified?
  • Can you deliver on your promise to solve this problem or address this opportunity now and if you grow?

Demonstrate Value

What a company values differs from what an individual student values. When marketing to businesses, schools must demonstrate value in relation to cost. Here are several focus areas to consider:

  • Impact on the company’s ability to perform. Most businesses are looking to impact their ability to perform in relation to their value chain. How can you support them in achieving that goal?
  • Compliance. Show companies in highly regulated industries, like healthcare, that you’re a trusted provider that can help them achieve and maintain compliance.
  • Frictionless experiences. Identify opportunities to reduce friction so companies perceive you as easy to do business with.
  • Price benefits. Business is personal. Everyone likes getting a deal and feeling like they’re receiving special treatment. Provide price benefits, such as bulk discounts, to entice decision-makers.
  • Speed and agility. Companies have unique cycles and timelines, and schools must be able to move quickly and flexibly to provide meaningful value.
  • Trust and track record (relationship). In addition to leveraging your school’s brand value, prove that you have a track record of following through with businesses.

Hone Your Messaging and Value Proposition

When engaging with businesses and developing corporate learning partnerships, it’s vital to have consistent messaging and a clear value proposition.

Examine the inflection points for a particular industry or vertical. Pinpoint where people in that industry require new information or education, and design a program to help them get to the next step in their career. Then, communicate your value proposition across marketing channels. 

Be patient and listen—a necessary component of B2B marketing is asking great questions and creating space to observe and notice how people respond.

Schools also gain tremendous value from identifying “coaches” inside companies who understand the value of their offerings. Internal coaches can serve as allies, helping you navigate the organization and share your value proposition with decision-makers.

Target Stakeholders and Decision-Makers

Human resources and training and development teams are common targets for schools that are marketing corporate partnerships because they are often the decision-makers responsible for managing internal training initiatives. They prioritize compliance, ease of access, tracking, and mapping to LMS or competencies, so schools’ messaging should hit those points.

However, the group of people we encourage schools to engage with most are line of business owners because they are empowered to make decisions quickly. These stakeholders are looking for speed (i.e., “just in time” programs), convenience, modular “just enough” content, and content that’s “just right” and will directly impact their business.

We also recommend targeting professional associations or partners. This outreach is most successful when schools add value for members and provide a low-friction experience.

Next up in Part 2: Sales Strategies

In part 2 of this series, we’ll focus on how colleges and universities can prepare effective sales strategies to drive corporate learning partnerships. Until then, if there is anything MindMax can do to support your school’s higher education marketing efforts, please don’t hesitate to reach out!

Lee Maxey is Founder and CEO of MindMax. Lee has led MindMax since its founding in 2009, providing technology-enabled marketing solutions to accelerate enrollments for universities. Lee takes pride in building long-lasting relationships with MindMax’s university partners and building a culture focused on results aligned with client specific needs. MindMax provides strategic guidance, proven processes, and the latest digital tools to optimize online marketing and enrollment operations for university-affiliated continuing and professional education organizations. We are a trusted advisor to many of the nation’s top universities, and have transformed hundreds of online programs, impacting over 1 million students.

Benchmark Survey Addresses Challenges and Opportunities Faced by Professional and Continuing Education Units and Traditional Academic Programs 

Washington, DC (July 24, 2023) – UPCEA, the online and professional education association, the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers (AACRAO), and Modern Campus recently partnered on a survey of their respective undergraduate-serving institutional members in the United States. The report Collaboration, Competition or Convergence?: The relationship between professional and continuing education and traditional academic programs, released today. The report explores the degree to which PCE, and traditional academic programs currently operate in collaboration or competition for students and/or institutional resources.

Data from this first-look 2023 benchmark survey addresses a number of issues, challenges and opportunities that institutional professional and continuing education (PCE) units face with academic registrars and others in central administration. This includes a startling stat: 86% of respondents from institutions with existing PCE units believe that barriers exist that impact the ability of the PCE unit and the academic registrar to work closely together. These barriers include lack of common practices, policies, shared technologies and serving a common learner population.

Survey results indicate that institutional PCE practices and offerings are varied. There is no predominant model that describes the level of cooperation or competition between the PCE unit and the academic registrar. However, there are increasing opportunities for PCE, and traditional academic programs to work together to enhance learning mobility, improve college access for undergraduate-adult learners and support institution-wide student success. 

“With increasing pressures and headwinds facing the traditional higher education model, it is essential that PCE units work closely with registrars and other central administrators to develop systems and processes that support a stackable model of education,” said Bruce Etter, Senior Director of Research & Consulting at UPCEA. “This symbiotic relationship will enable institutions to efficiently serve not only traditional students, but also degree completion students as well as professional and continuing education learners.”

By taking a more intentional, global and strategic approach to credential innovation, institutions can ensure equitable and accessible programs and opportunities that prepare all learners for the workforce and beyond. As institutions seek to be learner/student centric (as opposed to revenue-centered), this report sets the stage for cooperation on practice, policy and the use of technology to support various educational paths and opportunities in a more comprehensive manner.

“For decades, leaders in professional and continuing education (PCE) units have worked in parallel structures to manage programming and learners, developing best practices and operational excellence along the way. However, as their work becomes more critical to the future of the broader university, it’s essential to shrink barriers between PCE and traditional academic units like the Registrar’s Office,” said Amrit Ahluwalia, senior director of strategic insights at Modern Campus. “Research like this is central to creating a common understanding of the opportunities and challenges, and it’s our hope that this understanding leads to greater opportunities for collaboration and growth.”

Download the report to learn more about PCE practice within an institution, the type of credits and credentials offered, and the myriad of special-population programs to which learners have access. 

 

AACRAO

AACRAO is a non-profit, voluntary, professional association of more than 11,000 higher education professionals representing approximately 2,600 institutions in more than 40 countries. Its commitment to the professional development of its members includes best practice guidance on admissions strategies to meet institutional diversity objectives, delivery of academic programs in innovative ways to meet the needs of a changing student body, and exemplary approaches to student retention and completion. Learn more at aacrao.org

 

Modern Campus

Modern Campus is obsessed with empowering its 2,000+ higher education customers to thrive when radical transformation is required to respond to lower student enrollments and revenue, rising costs, crushing student debt, and administrative complexity. The Modern Campus engagement platform powers solutions for non-traditional student management, web content management, catalog and curriculum management, student engagement and development, conversational text messaging, career pathways, and campus maps and virtual tours. The result: innovative institutions can create a learner-to-earner lifecycle that engages modern learners for life, while providing modern administrators with the tools needed to streamline workflows and drive high efficiency. Modern Campus Presence empowers institutions to map and understand the entire student journey from Day 1, enabling learners to create learning pathways and gamify the earning of essential skills – all while streamlining organizational processes, collecting massive participation data, and assessing the impact you have on retention. Learn how Modern Campus is leading the modern learner engagement movement at moderncampus.com and follow us on LinkedIn.

 

UPCEA

UPCEA is the online and professional education association. Our members positively impact millions of lives by continuously reinventing higher education. We advance the professional field through cutting edge research, professional development, networking and mentorship, conferences and seminars, and stakeholder advocacy. Our collaborative, entrepreneurial community brings together decision makers and influencers in education, industry, research, and policy interested in improving educational access and outcomes. Learn more about us at UPCEA.edu and follow us on Twitter @UPCEA.

 

It is important that we give our learners experience in using generative AI to prepare them for job interviews, career advancement and efficient practices in the workplace.

One might ask why should we bend to the latest fad in our field? Let me be clear that AI is not a fad. It will not fade quietly away in a few months or years. It is, rather, an effective tool that is seen broadly as money-saving, creative and competitively-necessary in the workplace. Employers are expecting their new hires to have AI skills.  Resume Builder reported a survey they conducted in April of this year among 1,187 business leaders found 92% are currently hiring and of those who are currently hiring, 91% want workers with ChatGPT experience. The Boston Consulting Group surveyed some 13,000 people at all levels in the workforce.  They found the percentage of those reporting their company uses AI jumped from 22% in 2018 to 50% in 2023. Some 80% of those in leadership positions reported that they use AI daily. Survey respondents were found to be more optimistic than concerned about AI.

In higher education, we must be responsive to the employer needs and expectations in order that our learners are well-prepared for careers upon degree or certificate completion. In most circumstances, we have some months or years to prepare to respond to changing workplace needs. However, the rapid adoption of AI by business and industry has come in weeks and months rather than years.

With just a month or so before the start of fall classes, how can we best integrate AI into our classes and give our learners the valuable experience they need to land jobs and advance in this changing workspace?  First, we must ask what are the most basic outcomes we expect, and how can we relate those to our field or discipline?

I am an incrementalist in most endeavors, moving to improve in small ways rather than wholesale revisions of prior work. I believe it is most important that our learners have experience in using at least one or two of the most prominent generative AI apps; be able to create and follow-up on an effective prompt; and understand that it is good practice to test your results in at least two different applications to help ensure credible results. Also, given the short time span until classes begin and that we certainly don’t want to sacrifice the other content that has proven successful in the class, we should find ways to supplement, rather than replace large segments of our course materials.

I was moved to ponder ways we might best accomplish these outcomes by recent postings from David Wiley, the Chief Academic Officer of Lumen Learning. Wiley has suggested that we might create “generative textbooks” to replace traditional texts

Rather than creating an entire virtual generative text, I believe at this point in time while preparing for the fall term, the instructor might be better advised to supplement assignments in the current course syllabus. Briefly, the process would include:

  • Identify several key modules in the syllabus for which you would direct deeper study through generative AI. You might choose ones that are changing over time, ones that generate a variety of opinions, or ones that are most important for the desired learning outcomes of the course.
  • Write sample prompts to explore more current or in-depth views of each of the selected key modules and share them with the learners.
  • You may want to read and share with learners, Laura Starita’s Contently article “How to Write AI Prompts: The Key to Better Outputs from Generative AI” with your learners.
  • Assign learners to use your sample prompts and write their own follow-up prompts in at least a couple of different AI chatbots such as ChatGPT, Google Bard, Bing Chat, Com, or Perplexity.
  • As a concluding project of the series of gen AI inquiries, you might request that they create their own initial as well as follow-up prompts.
  • Ask your learners to assess, compare and contrast the results in a modest discussion essay. You might also ask them to compare the sources used by the AI application. 

The outcomes you are seeking include:

  • Experience in using well-formed prompts on topics of relevance to the field of study and possibly the field of employment or advancement
  • Experience in writing follow-up prompts to refine responses
  • Developing understanding and expectations of what various AI applications are capable of providing
  • Adding more current contextual information on key topical areas than is normally built into the course

These are modest, yet important, outcomes to give your learners valuable familiarity and experience with gen AI applications.  Your learners will be able to add to their portfolio the ability to assess, compare, contrast AI responses as examples of their experience and insights into generative AI. These experiences may be valuable in the job application and interview process.

Over time, you may choose to further integrate more assignments using gen AI in your classes. Remember that the APA has now established formatting for citations of gen AI material.  Also, remember that as of this time, gen AI material cannot be copyrighted.

While this is a relatively small step in integrating AI into your courses, it may be very important.  I believe you will be surprised at the curiosity, creativity and critical thinking that it stimulates among your learners. It will open the door to students using these tools to adapt your other content to their needs and circumstances. I believe the learners will be more likely to turn to gen AI to answer questions they otherwise would be reluctant to raise and to build deeper understanding of the subject they are studying. Equally important, it will launch you, the instructor, on the path of using this powerful new tool in your teaching.

 

This article was originally published in Inside Higher Ed’s Transforming Teaching & Learning blog.

A man (Bruce Etter) is dressed in a blue suit smiling for a headshot.

By Bruce Etter

On a recent soggy summer day, I sauntered into my yard with a pair of loppers in one hand and my trusty instructor, my phone, in the other. For the first time, I was going to prune our rose bushes. Like many millennials, I consulted the internet prior to embarking on this task to better understand not only how to prune a rose bush (which seemed intuitive enough), but also why I should do so. What I learned is that while pruning encourages increased blooms, more importantly, it protects the remainder of the bush from potential diseases. As I was removing the dead and diseased canes, I found myself thinking about the parallels between a college or university’s portfolio of programs and the bush I was delicately tending to.

Over the last few years UPCEA’s Research and Consulting team has reviewed thousands of programs through its portfolio decision-making model (PDMM). All too often, we would see the equivalent of diseased or dying programs within an institution’s portfolio. While programs may have once bloomed with enrollments, they may now be in decline, steadily losing the vitality they once knew. Rather than institutions recognizing and compassionately removing these programs from the portfolio, they are left to languish on in a destitute perpetuity, sapping resources that could better serve the portfolio elsewhere. Although it may be clear that action is needed to stop the prolonged programmatic decay, there is often a lack of guidance on how and when to make those decisions.  

UPCEA’s June 2023 snap poll found that nearly two-thirds (64%) of respondents disagreed (41%) or strongly disagreed (23%) with the notion that their institution has a clearly defined set of metrics and parameters for determining if a program should be sunset. Despite the lack of clear guidelines, the poll found 80% of institutions have sunset a program within the last three years, averaging 5.3 programs per institution during that time span. These were most often non-credit (37%), followed by graduate degrees (20%) and graduate certificates (22%).[1] As higher education’s competitive market continues to tighten, it will be critical for institutions to have established parameters for sunsetting programs, and to effectively communicate those metrics to faculty and staff.

Given the understandable sensitivities around sunsetting programs, it is imperative that the process is driven by data. Most programs begin with promise and hope for the institution. People develop relationships with and through the program. Some programs can have successful multi-decade runs before their time runs out. Because of this, individuals in and around the program can feel as though a decision to sunset a program is a reflection on how an institution may value them or their work. With these realities in mind, academic leaders must have empathetic ears while also operating on clearly defined metrics. Measurable metrics that can influence the decision to sunset a program include but are not limited to program inquiries, applications, enrollments, student retention, gross revenue, marketing costs, faculty costs, and net revenue, among others.

Furthermore, assessing whether the program is meeting a market need is essential. In addition to internal metrics, institutions should look beyond their own borders to better understand program viability. Assuming new programming decisions are driven by relevant data, rather than gut feelings or pressure from donors, it is important to ask if the market factors that led to the creation of the program still hold true. Resources such as the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) can inform whether or not other institutions are experiencing sustained drops in enrollments. Organizations like Lightcast can detail labor market forecasts and in-demand skills for occupations associated with the program. UPCEA can provide feasibility studies or custom consulting to aid in these decisions. Potential challenges can stem from a lack of perceived value, marketing issues, program nomenclature, program isolation, curriculum relevancy, and tuition, among others. While some of these issues can be addressed, others cannot. Regardless of the root cause or causes, institutions need to be transparent around the sunsetting process. 

Some institutions, like Sonoma State University, have policies that emphasize that program discontinuation should not be a response to short-term financial crises or personnel shortages, but instead should result from factors such as underfunding, insufficient faculty, or inadequate support.[2] To avoid situations where there is dispute over discontinuing an academic program, the University of Wisconsin has a planning process for discontinuing or suspending degree/major programs and certificate programs. The process involves the review and approval of proposals by the academic department that owns the program, the school/college, the University Academic Planning Council for undergraduate programs, and the Graduate Faculty Executive Committee Council for graduate programs. The approved proposals are then reported to relevant offices within UW-Madison by the Provost’s Office.[3]

Closing an academic program is a complex decision that requires careful consideration and communication. Administrators must assess whether program closure is truly necessary, while also recognizing potential costs such as lost confidence in the institution from students, staff, or faculty, resistance from alumni and other program supporters, and potentially negative press. Additionally, the institution will need to create a thoughtful teach out plan for individuals that are actively enrolled in the program and strategize where to best use the expertise of faculty that were involved with the program. Furthermore, closing programs solely as a response to financial constraints may not result in significant short-term savings unless other cost-saving measures are implemented.[4]

With these potential challenges in mind, it is crucial to have a clear, compelling, and unwavering case for why a program is being closed, ensuring consistent communication of the decision, process, and rationale to stakeholders. Recognizing that the closure process can be political, administrators need to understand stakeholder dynamics and the need for inclusive listening. Implementing decisions requires attention to detail and a focus on people, as closing a program can be emotionally challenging for those involved.[5] Sunsetting academic programs requires a comprehensive assessment of various factors and considerations for stakeholders to understand the reason behind the decision and for the discontinuation process to run smoothly. In order to have clear communication and know when it is appropriate to sunset an academic program, it is essential that institutions have clear guidelines in place.While sunsetting a program is always going to be a difficult decision, it is sometimes necessary to protect the greater health of the portfolio and the institution. Much like my rosebush, understanding why and when the cut needs to be made is paramount to carrying out the task effectively. Resources that had been spent on the declining program can instead be used to nurture other offerings and help the totality of the portfolio thrive. 

 

Bruce Etter, Senior Director of Research & Consulting, is responsible for developing and managing research initiatives for UPCEA Research and Consulting and its clients. He graduated from Penn State University with a Bachelor’s of Science in Sociology and a minor in Sustainability Leadership.

 

[1] UPCEA June 2023 Snap Poll

[2] https://academicaffairs.sonoma.edu/academic-programs/curriculum-guide/discontinuing-academic-program

[3] https://kb.wisc.edu/apir/page.php?id=116213

[4] https://www.chronicle.com/article/what-to-consider-when-closing-an-academic-program/

[5] https://www.chronicle.com/article/what-to-consider-when-closing-an-academic-program/

Key Insights

  • The majority of Professional, Continuing, and Online Education units prioritize paid search advertising. This shows that institutions view search as an important part of a prospect’s journey — but a much smaller portion invest in SEO.
  • Search engine optimization is worthy of ongoing investment. However, university marketing units and outsourced marketing providers don’t make a compelling case to deans and decision-makers that they should invest in it.
  • PCO units can make better short- and long-term marketing investments and reduce their dependency on paid search advertising by learning more about the relationship between paid and organic search and the prospect’s journey in search.

 

In our three-part Higher Education SEO Research Study, conducted in partnership with the University Professional Continuing Education Association (UPCEA), our goal was to understand higher ed and marketing leaders’ perspectives on SEO and find out the “SEO readiness” of PCO units within higher ed institutions.

As an SEO marketer for more than 12 years, I’ve seen the broader marketing world’s knowledge of SEO grow over time, but there remains a gap in knowledge in many industries, including higher education.

Our research study results confirmed this.

One promising finding is that higher education marketers seem to understand that prospective students are searching online during their journey to higher education, and it’s necessary to have a presence in search results.

The study makes it clear: A staggering 91% of survey respondents said they integrate paid search into the PCO unit’s strategy.

On the other hand, only 27% strongly agreed with the following statements:

  • My marketing department has a process for optimizing website content for targeted keywords.
  • My marketing department intentionally builds links to grow our website’s search engine authority.

Infographic: 91% of higher ed marketing departments use paid search in their SEO, but only 27% use keyword optimization and link building.

These findings beg the question: Why are higher ed institutions failing to prioritize core SEO tactics when they know search is a critical part of the prospect’s journey? This may be due to a lack of internal resource (talent and dollars) allocation and a deficit in the SEO chops of outsourced higher ed marketing partners.

The disparity between paid search and SEO prioritization, combined with the 58.6 / 100 SEO Readiness Score, indicates that PCO marketing units may lack the foundational understanding of search engine marketing. In particular, they need education around how paid search and SEO differ from one another, how they are connected, and what tactics they should prioritize to support (and optimize the potential of) both.

Without SEO, Higher Ed Marketers Miss Out on Prospects in Two Out of Three Critical Stages of the Funnel

Here’s the issue — the majority of paid search campaigns are tailored toward prospects in the middle of the marketing funnel, the “consideration phase.” These paid campaigns serve up results for keywords such as “online HR degree,” which are great for prospects looking for your top programs. However, this narrow approach might cause you to miss out on other curious searchers.

Without proper SEO, students won’t see your PCO unit in the awareness and decision stages of their search journey.

Awareness-stage prospects looking for career growth info could find a blog post about the demand for graduates with a certain degree. In the decision phase, prospects may be searching specific brand keywords related to registration dates or the application process — and your best information for these searches might not be found.

With a higher education marketing strategy focusing on paid search alone, you may also miss out on more skeptical searchers. According to Forbes, some users find organic search results more trustworthy than those showing up in sponsored positions. This level of trust leads to more than just a warm, fuzzy feeling. It also means that organic search results earn higher click-through rates than their paid-for counterparts. (However, paid search certainly has a ton of benefits and is a very successful tactic for many organizations.)

When you fully incorporate SEO into your higher education digital marketing strategy, you can ensure you’re considering prospects at each stage in the marketing funnel. A full-funnel approach is the only way to completely nurture leads and turn them into enrolled students.

An image of an adult learner researching continuing education institutions on his laptop.

Why Do Higher Education Marketers Invest In Paid Search Over SEO?

We attribute the disparity in investment in higher education paid search over SEO to a few things:

  1. SEO is harder to understand (and a well-crafted paid search campaign can also be quite complex if you take advantage of all features available).
  2. SEO takes continual human effort over time (although paid search needs continual optimization to be most effective).
  3. Paid search can be easier to tie to enrollment (but it is possible to do this with SEO too).
  4. Paid search results can be more tangible (and if you know what metrics to track and how to report on SEO success, SEO results can be tangible as well).
  5. SEO work can be viewed as something that is part of ongoing website development — that doesn’t need a dedicated investment in your higher ed marketing budget (but in order to assure you are truly able to compete on Google, a dedicated SEO investment is as critical as your paid search investment).

It’s apparent: PCO units are not making the best short- and long-term investments for their marketing strategies. In the short term, strategic SEO can benefit paid search advertising results to improve cost efficiency. And in the long term, it creates less dependency on paid search tactics overall.

 

So, What Should Higher Ed Institutions Do About It?

  1. Get hungry to learn about the differences and overlaps between SEO and paid search advertising.
  2. Understand SEO as a long-term play at building authority, relevance, and visibility in search.
  3. Invest in SEO to develop long-term independence from paid search, ultimately saving money and reducing costs per action.
An image of higher ed marketing leaders sitting around a table discussing ways to improve their SEO and digital marketing strategy.

Get Hungry to Learn About SEO and Paid Search Advertising

As a higher ed marketing agency professional, here are a few key things I wish more clients understood about the relationship between SEO and paid search advertising:

  • While nothing in the digital world is permanent, investing in SEO builds the authority of your website, which is a critical brand asset. With paid search, your brand can disappear as soon as you stop spending. Essentially, paid search allows you to rent space to advertise. With SEO, once you’ve earned high-ranking search positions, it can take serious effort by your competition for you to lose that ground.
  • SEO and paid search advertising often get lumped into the bucket of “search engine marketing,” but it’s important to understand they are not the same thing. They both hope to achieve the same end — to make a website visible to the qualified prospect actively searching for things you offer. However, the execution is significantly different and requires distinct skill sets. This is why in our SEO and paid search-focused agency, we have SEO strategists and digital advertising strategists — two separate resources who come together to collaborate.

 

SEO Is a Long-Term Play

SEO is more than just content:

  • It’s an investment in technical health and content accessibility for your audience.
  • It aims to build your brand’s authority, relevance, and visibility in search results.
  • It’s a “marathon, not a sprint.” You can’t expect to “do a little SEO” and suddenly start ranking for all the degrees or certificates in the top spot.

Understand that SEO will require ongoing dedication to both build and earn competitive positions — and then maintain them.

An image of a higher ed marketer using a laptop to optimize their SEO strategy and taking notes.

Invest in SEO, Build Greater Independence From Paid Search

When an institution invests in SEO and succeeds at building its website and brand’s authority, relevance, and visibility in search results, they gain a key asset: greater independence from paid search. And that means improved costs per inquiry, lead, or enrollment.

It’s hard to believe, but I’ve seen websites so poorly optimized that they don’t rank organically for their own brand names. Without investment in solving these problems, institutions like these will always depend on paid search to even capture the people searching for them by name!

“Branded search” is a term we use to describe people searching for you by name. As you can imagine, these folks are likely further in their decision-making journey, and you may have already spent marketing dollars on them to make them brand-aware. When your website doesn’t organically rank well for these highly qualified searchers, you depend on bidding on your own brand name through paid search advertising. This is costly!

With a strong branded presence in organic search, you can get those clicks — and free up budget. Then, you can spend that budget on degrees or programs that need more dollars to compete, whether in paid search, SEO, or display.

Conversion-optimized landing pages are best practice, but you’ll often want to also land ad clicks on your website pages. With content optimization through SEO, you can improve your webpage’s quality and positively impact your advertising. This approach ensures that prospects discover valuable information on your landing page, while also boosting your ad relevance, quality score, and ad rank.

These benefits translate into cost savings — stretching your ad budget even further.

Closing the gap in knowledge and prioritization of SEO is crucial for implementing a well-rounded and successful higher education digital marketing strategy. PCO units can strengthen their brand authority, visibility, and relevance in search results by investing in SEO and understanding its critical role alongside paid search. Embracing SEO as a fundamental component of your strategy enables you to effectively engage with prospective students at every stage of their journey, ultimately driving enrollment and long-term institutional success.

Some institutions may need support in the knowledge and expertise related to SEO, some may need support with capacity and time allocation to the effort, and some may need both. Working with an expert higher education marketing agency, like Search Influence, can support both expertise and capacity challenges, and help bridge the gap in your paid search and SEO strategies.

 

As the head of Search Influence’s account strategy team, Alison Zeringue is passionate about a few key metrics to which her team is accountable: campaign results, the client experience, client retention and growth. Prior to joining Search Influence in 2011, Alison earned her degree in Advertising from LSU’s Manship School and worked as a marketing and advertising liaison for small businesses, nonprofits, and entrepreneurs throughout Louisiana. Today, she enjoys working directly with some of Search Influence’s clients on digital and big-picture strategy and indirectly for others through the training and day-to-day support she provides to account managers.

We are already halfway through the summer. Now is the time to put into action your resolution to apply the power of AI at work!

Generative AI has been around for a few years, but it hit the higher ed scene in a big way in 2022 with GPT 3.5. All of a sudden, it seemed, artificial intelligence was becoming more than science fiction. Useful tools became available to the average person and the imperative to understand and join the revolution became a reality. This fall, those academic offices, university classes, and research studies that do not tap the potential of GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) apps using LLM (Large Language Models) will stick out like virtual Model T Fords on the turnpikes of the 21st century.

Seriously, the power of these apps is enormous and growing fast. Our colleagues and students are expecting us to utilize these tools this fall. With only half a dozen weeks left to the start of the fall term, what can you possibly accomplish?

Naturally, I asked a couple of the leading generative AI applications for their advice. I prompted ChatGPT+ and Google Bard on June 22, 2023 to give me some ideas of what we can still do at this point in the summer. Collectively, they recommended some 50 different generative AI activities to pursue in higher education teaching and administration. I selected some of those to share with you here.

First, however, I recommend that you take an hour or so to practice writing prompts for the various AI tools you plan to use. Laura Starita, from The Content Strategist, provides a useful list of elements of successful prompts that you will want to review before beginning your quest. In brief, she recommends:

  • Describe your goal output.
  • Describe the audience and style.
  • Include keywords or phrases you want the AI to incorporate.
  • Ask for any special formatting.
  • Provide source material or examples.
  • Revise.

Make sure you read the brief article linked above to learn the important nuances of how to successfully prompt generative AI. You will then be ready to begin.

Each of the apps I prompted came up with uses by categories, here are some of the possibilities that Google Bard and ChatGPT recommended.

Enhancing Teaching

  • Generative AI can be a powerful tool for curating and creating educational content. (ChatGPT)
  • Personalizing instruction: Generative AI can be used to personalize instruction by generating customized learning materials and assessments for each student. This can help to ensure that all students are able to reach their full potential. (Google Bard)
  • Generative AI can be used to create interactive learning modules that engage students and help them learn in a more meaningful way. These modules can include text, images, videos, and simulations. (Google Bard)
  • Personalized Learning: Given the AI’s ability to adapt to user inputs, it can help create personalized study materials, tutorials, or even quizzes tailored to each student’s unique needs. (ChatGPT)
  • Providing feedback on student work: Generative AI can be used to provide feedback on student work, identifying areas where students need additional help. For example, a generative AI tool could be used to analyze student essays and provide feedback on grammar, style, and content. (Google Bard)

Administering Academic Departments

  • Managing budgets: Generative AI can be used to manage budgets and identify areas where costs can be saved. This can help to ensure that programs are sustainable and efficient. (Google Bard)
  • Documentation and Reporting: AI can automate the creation of meeting minutes, reports, or other administrative documents, reducing manual effort and improving precision. (ChatGPT)
  • Communication: AI can draft emails, newsletters, or other forms of communication, ensuring consistency and professionalism. It can also help handle frequently asked questions or standard requests, freeing up time for more complex tasks. (ChatGPT)
  • Identifying trends in enrollments; comparing your programs to those at competing universities including content, emphases, new initiatives (Google Bard)
  • Planning and Scheduling: AI can assist in creating course schedules, planning meetings, or organizing events, bringing speed and convenience to complex logistical tasks. (ChatGPT)

Improving Efficiency

  • Data Analysis: Generative AI can help analyze complex data sets, providing insights into student performance, course efficacy, and administrative effectiveness. This will inform evidence-based decision-making and strategy development. (ChatGPT)
  • Researching topics: Generative AI can be used to research topics and find information. This can save time for professors, deans, and directors who need to stay up-to-date on the latest research in their field. (Google Bard)
  • Recruiting students: Generative AI can be used to recruit students to academic programs. This can help to attract a more diverse and qualified student body. (Google Bard)
  • Automating tasks: Generative AI can be used to automate many of the tasks that are currently performed by humans. This can free up time for professors, deans, and directors to focus on more strategic work. (Google Bard)
  • AI can identify patterns and trends, predicting student performance or foreseeing potential administrative challenges. This can help educators and administrators proactively address issues, improving both learning outcomes and operational efficiency. (ChatGPT)

These are just a handful of the millions of ways in which generative AI can be useful to you in your university position. I recommend that you focus on AI assistance in one aspect of your work at a time. Think of generative AI as your new research or teaching assistant. This is the brightest and fastest assistant you have ever had. It never sleeps. It doesn’t go on Spring Break. It has near perfect scores on the SAT, the GRE, and now, it even has passed a bar exam. So, don’t hold back; Google Bard, ChatGPT and other generative AI bots are fully capable of finding information, organizing, and reporting results in a credible way, whether that be text, image, spreadsheet, or database.

Select something meaningful that generative AI can add to your repertoire for the fall. You will have a bright, shiny, relevant, useful example to share as evidence of your understanding of the potential of this application to enhance and advance a selected part of your job. It will put you on the path to becoming a more productive, efficient and effective leader.

 

This article was originally published in Inside Higher Ed’s Transforming Teaching + Learning blog.