Major Updates

 

  • Department of Education Announces Intent to Rewrite of State Authorization, Distance Education, Third-Party Servicers Among Others
    The Biden Administration announced in the first days of 2023 their intent to rework this year eight different areas of higher education regulations via negotiated rulemaking. The topics include many in which the UPCEA community has a vested interest. While the Department has announced their intent to move forward on these, no proposed language has yet been put forth. Here are four of the eight proposed topics the UPCEA community will be most interested in following:

    • Distance Education
    • Accreditation and Related Issues 
    • State Authorization
    • Third-Party Servicers and Related Agencies 

So, what now? The Department has stated that beginning in April it will move forward on all of the eight topics. The Department will soon give dates and times for at least two or more regional field hearings seeking public comment on the proposed regulatory topics they intend to review and rewrite. They will also provide a calendar for when the required three multi-day sessions in Washington, D.C. will be held. Through these sessions, the proposed regulations will be worked through by negotiators from different facets of the higher education community, who can be nominated by the public. UPCEA will notify our members throughout the process as it moves forward, and will let you know the key dates and periods in which you can weigh in on the changes and lend our community’s voice to these issues which are critical to the work we do. Read more.

 

 

  • Invite Your Students to the DC Student Summit
    Being held this coming March 12-14, the three-day DC Student Summit in our nation’s capital will equip students with the skills necessary to elevate their stories and lived experiences directly to federal policymakers. Led by the Today’s Students Coalition (of which UPCEA is a steering committee member), LeadMN, and Young Invincibles, students will have the opportunity to participate in conversations about college accessibility, the cost of higher education, the importance of racial equity, and efforts undertaken to ensure that students’ basic needs are being met. Read more and share with students.

 

Other News

  • Public Comment on Data Collection, Due February 17 (US Department of Education)
    The U.S. Department of Education is seeking comments that may include information, research, and suggestions regarding the Department’s implementation of the new authority provided to the Department in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, to reserve funding from certain programs authorized by the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA), for the purpose of carrying out rigorous and independent evaluations and conducting data collection and analysis of such programs.
  • More Money for Pell Grants, Research (Inside Higher Ed)
    Federal budget boosts maximum Pell Grant and funding for student success grant programs. Colleges and universities also are set to receive more than $1.5 billion for projects in earmarks.

While hastily planned remote instruction differs from fully planned online college programs, education experts say a shift during the coronavirus pandemic accelerated the growth of online learning.

Colleges are now poised to offer more choices in distance learning, but it takes time, expertise and resources to develop quality online degree programs, says Lisa Templeton, associate provost for Oregon State University’s Ecampus and extended campus programs.

“Many of our faculty and students that would’ve never wanted to teach online or take an online course had to during the pandemic,” she says. “I think they learned that you can connect in meaningful and transformative ways.”

Here’s a look at the future of distance learning as predicted by those who work in online education.

1. Colleges Will Add New Online Programs

After a test run for many schools over the last few years, colleges are emboldened to offer more degree programs virtually, experts say.

Schools may also see a chance to boost enrollment in programs with declining numbers. Shifting programs to online allows colleges to cast a broader net and not rely on local or regional students to boost their headcount, says Ray Schroeder, professor emeritus at the University of Illinois—Springfield and senior fellow at the University Professional and Continuing Education Association.

Read the full article here.

ChatGPT has caught our attention in higher education. What will it mean in 2023?

First, let’s do a quick review on the technology. GPT has become the internet’s best-known language processing AI model. The initials stand for Generative Pretrained Transformer. That’s not a very descriptive title to the non-AI person. OpenAI developed the hot new model of text interface, ChatGPT. OpenAI is an AI research and deployment company based in San Franciso with a self-described mission to ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity. Previously, OpenAI had developed DALL-E2, an impressive image generator that creates illustrations and artwork following a text description provided by the inquirer.

According to Alex Hughes writing in Science Focus, “ChatGPT is a “state-of-the-art language processing AI model developed by OpenAI. It is capable of generating human-like text and has a wide range of applications…. The model was trained using text databases from the internet. This included a whopping 570GB of data obtained from books, webtexts, Wikipedia, articles and other pieces of writing on the internet. To be even more exact, 300 billion words were fed into the system.” 

The system can write cogent summaries of information that is gleaned from the massive database. It can give a reasoned response to questions, and can even put them in the form of poetry or a variety of languages. It can write essays and modest research papers in a matter of seconds.

One of the investors in OpenAI is Microsoft. The company reportedly has plans to integrate ChatGPT into its search engine Bing with a March release. For higher education, this may mean that students will be able to simply use the Bing search engine to generate whole paragraphs and, perhaps, pages of text for a class assignment. Clearly, the technology will continue to evolve and advance, yet we have now reached a point at which as educators we must develop pedagogy, practices and policies regarding generative AI in both text and visual forms.

For those seeking to follow the rapidly emerging applications that are built around GPT, educational developer Doug Holton who tracks the emergence and applications of new technologies in our field, posted on Mastodon some valuable sites for those following this field: one a searchable list of rapidly growing AI applications  and another provides a regularly updated list of GPT products

We are not without precedent confronting the dilemma of how to respond to a new technology that impacts learner responses in traditional quizzes and exams. In the mid 1960s when hand calculators were developed, and later programmable calculators, educators in math and science were confronted with a similar challenge. At first, some educators attempted to ban the use of the devices by students. Eventually, realizing that these had become ubiquitous, they were integrated into instruction and assessment. It has become clear that advances in technology are rarely, if ever, denied by society. I am confident that generative AI will be embraced by business and industry in ways that will enhance efficiency and accuracy in services. So, our learners, as they pursue careers, will do so in an AI-rich environment. They will be expected to make the best use of these technologies to perform effectively on the job. Thus, it is incumbent on us, as educators, to ensure that our learners have experience with the technologies as well as develop effective practices for their optimal use.

That, of course, will cause some effort for us to adapt to student access to GPT as they submit papers and responses to class assignments. We need to re-think our assessments in terms of the tools and strategies that the learners in our classes will be using in their careers in the coming years. They certainly will have access to generative AI for text and images, also perhaps video and VR. So, our assessments should evolve toward more authentic learning assessments.

Founder and CEO at Moodle, Martin Dougiamas, writes in Open Ed Tech that as educators, we must recognize that Artificial General Intelligence will become ubiquitous. “In short, we need to embrace that AI is going to be a huge part of our lives when creating anything. There is no gain in banning it or avoiding it. It’s actually easier (and better) to use this moment to restructure our education processes to be useful and appropriate in today’s environment (which is full of opportunities).” 

We are now beginning to confront the question of which jobs will be replaced by GPT-powered technologies. In this NPR interview, Ethan Mollick, professor at the Wharton School of Business, notes that he was informed all of the questions that were asked were formed by ChatGPT. He couldn’t tell during the interview that they were not written by the interviewer.

AI technologies will continue to improve and expand. I believe that it is important that all disciplines in higher ed from the liberal arts to engineering examine the changing nature of the workforce that awaits their learners. We must adapt to update our learning plans, outcomes and assessments to include the advances that are upon us and our students.

Who, at your institution, is examining the impact of AI, and in particular GPT, upon the curriculum? Are instructional designers working with instructors in revising syllabi and embedding AI applications into the course offerings? What can you do to ensure that your university is preparing learners for the future rather than the past?

 

This article was originally published in Inside Higher Ed’s Transforming Teaching & Learning blog. 

A decade ago, the buzz phrase was the Internet of Things or IoT. Cell phones had limited power and apps were just starting to bridge the internet with mobile devices. Uber had only recently launched (2010). Online banking was in its early stages of acceptance and electric cars were almost non-existent. Facebook was a third of its size and TikTok hadn’t even been born (it launched in 2017). Colleges in the U.S. enrolled just over 20 million students with about three-quarters being exclusively on-campus. Most recent enrollment data show that number to be closer to 16 million today, many of whom are taking courses in a variety of formats: face-to-face, online and hybrid.1 The world was very different a decade ago.

While we may not necessarily see it at the individual consumer level, there are major signs of a rapidly advancing new economy, one that is becoming increasingly more dependent on automation and technology. This will have a significant impact on society and what we see as today’s daily norms. While our attention is focused on comfortably emerging from a pandemic, major disruptors to the workforce are on the horizon. One such example can be found at the ever-popular Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas. While much of the shiny objects at this year’s show centered around robotics, AI and entertainment, the shocker for me was advancements that Caterpillar Corporation had made around farming, mining, and managing the supply chain. Its equipment can operate autonomously or via remote control where progress, location, and diagnostics are tracked remotely. While humans are needed to develop and maintain this technology, fewer individuals are required in what were previously high labor activities (planting, seeding, maintaining, harvesting, delivering, etc.), often with significant health and safety risks. 

Technology and automation are increasingly impacting what was a high human-involved workforce. While science and technology sectors are growing, there are signs in some industries that automation is accelerating at a faster rate than that where previously displaced workers can re-enter and contribute. Despite low unemployment rates in the U.S., there are workplace shortages. As can be seen with the Great Resignation of 2020 and 2021, employers are weighing the risks and costs associated with a human workforce against automated replacement. For example, the retention of workers in the retail and food service industry has caused a greater acceleration to more automated processes, evidences by the opening of fully automated McDonald’s restaurants in Texas2 and a greater dependence on kiosks and self-checkouts at Walmart and other retailers. As a result, in the short term, millions of displaced workers will shift to new industries or remain unemployed. For higher education, the dream of a 120-credit degree may be a bridge too far for many given their financial instability and lack of disposable income.

While much of higher education often ignores workers in retail and the food industry as high potential candidates for continuing or traditional education, other industries more connected or dependent on colleges and universities are also likely to suffer in a potential recession. In addition to a lack of front line workers in retail and food, manufacturing may also face similar shortages and robotics will likely gain as a result. Recent U.S. legislation and supply chain fragility have incentivized businesses to manufacture closer to home, shifting away from low-cost overseas manufacturing. However, the net number of new jobs created is difficult to forecast given trade-offs between human capital and labor availability and potential cost efficiencies created through automation. While institutions of higher education are poised to prepare programmers, managers, scientists and technology workers for the future through associate’s, bachelor’s or graduate degrees, are they able to adapt to more immediate short-term needs such as in transportation, customer service, social media, coding and other fields?

With some industries declining and others growing, are colleges and universities preparing for reskilling and transitioning? Demographics and politics indicate an increasing shift from fossil fuels to more sustainable sources. Younger adults are demanding healthier products, thus impacting health and nutrition sectors.3 This has caused disruption in both the alcohol (as young people are consuming less alcohol4) and protein-based food industries. While they have a greater understanding of nutrition and health, they have put additional pressure on the mental health industry, becoming a generation more dependent on professional mental health and counseling services. As a side note, they’ve also disrupted and fueled the “petconomy5,” nearly doubling its size over the past decade.6 While there have been clear and obvious shifts prior to and as a result of the pandemic, higher education seems to have only wiggled or comfortably shifted, as opposed to responding with the same urgency and immediacy as other industries. One could also argue that the higher education industry, like retail and food, is in decline regarding its revenues and staffing. This does not have to continue along this trajectory if higher education adapts at the same rate as other industries in transition. Higher education can reinvent itself and grow, becoming the major player in workforce reskilling, as well as attracting a large segment of the 39 million adults in the U.S. who have college credit but lack a degree (yet still may have college debt).7

It will take time, but higher education will need to reinvent itself. It will need to innovate and establish new norms, otherwise it will experience contraction. I believe that it will reinvent or at least re-engineer itself. In the long-run, higher education will be shaped more by employers, which means working more collaboratively on competencies and content needs, as well as offering more modular and flexible education. Recent studies by UPCEA, in collaboration with Collegis Education (soon to be published) and InsideTrack show a greater expectation of employers at the decision-making table.8 The research also supports a growing acceptance of more modular and flexible educational credentials, such as badges and certificates.

What can be expected for 2023 (and beyond):

  1. More financial pressures centrally at institutions will fuel more external revenue-generating activities, such as offering more fully online degrees, creation of microcredentials, and professional and continuing education expansion, among others. A recent report by Higher Ed Dive showed a number of institutions merging (Presidio Graduate School with University of Redlands9, Marymount California University with St. Leo University, etc.), as well as some shuttering their doors (Holy Name University, Cazenovia College, Bloomfield College, Chatfield College, Lincoln College, San Francisco Art Institute, etc.).10 As a result, greater operational efficiencies will be sought, but also new or expanded revenue streams will be explored. Institutions that have offered online and continuing education programs (often as a service or for supplemental income) will be required to do more. They will be tasked to find new students, re-engage lost students, create profitable new degrees and develop a microcredential capability.

  2. More younger students will enroll directly into fully online degrees. A 2019 survey of 5,000 students from 20 institutions conducted by UPCEA and InsideTrack showed that 2% of learners were 18 to 22 years of age and enrolled in a fully online degree program. In 2021, this number increased to nearly 5%. As reported by Inside HigherEd (October 2022), Southern New Hampshire University and Western Governors University reported increased online enrollments coming from the 18-to-24 year old segment.11 Many market factors, such as cost of housing, campus fees and commuting, as well as being able to shop more broadly across an expanded number of providers, are likely to fuel this phenomenon in the near future. Psychological factors, such as being closer to one’s support network or the desire to stay closer to home to care for loved ones, may also contribute to younger fully online enrollments.

    “We are seeing a noticeable jump in the number of 18- to 22-year-old students enrolling in fully online programs. In the past 5 years, there has been a 104% increase in the number of incoming undergraduates who are traditional college age students but enrolled in Oregon State Ecampus’ online programs. There are probably numerous reasons for this increase such as many students of this generation’s comfort and preference for online learning, and desire to stay closer to home and save money.”
    -Lisa Templeton, Associate Provost, Oregon State University, Ecampus

     

  3. When it comes to new programs, institutions will focus more on pathways, as opposed to one-off opportunistic programs. They will develop a portfolio of degrees and programs that creates pathways to very discrete professions. Gone are the days of a standalone degree with no pathway in or out. Institutions will need to build off their strengths in new program development and strengthen their academic portfolios. For example, if an institution is known for its data science, analytics, and statistics programs, not only should it have bachelor’s, master’s and doctorate programs, but also offer an associate’s degree or partner with a community college. If the market values it, they should also develop noncredit, undergraduate and graduate certificates that one could take as standalone credentials to enhance their existing degree. They could also use them to build toward a degree that would have otherwise been out of reach. In addition, smaller modules that don’t carry credit but earn badges or continuing education units (CEUs) that could be applied toward a degree or certificate would help to fill knowledge and skill voids created by a rapidly moving economy where degrees are unable to.

  4. Degree completion and welcoming the disengaged student will become more and more important. In the past, when students left an institution because of grades, family matters or finances, the cavalier attitude of “they weren’t cut out for XYZ College” was often the case, believing that the disengaged student was someone else’s problem or opportunity. Given today’s more competitive landscape for students, the declining number of 18 to 22 year-olds, and precarious financial institutional situations, more colleges and universities will strengthen their approaches to minimize these losses, as well as capture lost students from other colleges. UPCEA and StraighterLine research shows that students who leave for particular reasons can be attracted back to college, but with different tactics and approaches.12 To offset financial pressures due to previously mentioned factors, the nation’s colleges and universities can tap into the market that measures over 39 million adults with some college and no degree.13 Capturing a small percentage of this market can make the difference for many struggling institutions.

  5. Stackability will become more acceptable, although it is likely to take longer than a year. While we continue to struggle with loans and loan forgiveness and who qualifies for loans, consumers will continue to assess their personal financial risks and investment as they relate to education and employability. While awareness is growing, the new adult learner places considerable value on the stackable education model.14 As a result, we will see more stackability as a “cake and eat it too” strategy. Institutions which had resisted innovating beyond the degree may see certificates and microcredentials that carry value to the degree as a compromise. Faculty who were previously entrenched in the belief that it was the degree or nothing may see institutional vulnerabilities that may suggest change is in order. These may also be the same faculty who questioned the quality of online education and considered it inferior to classroom-based instruction.

  6. Earning or preparing for industry certification on the way toward a degree. While the notion of noncredit-to-credit transfer will continue to challenge higher education institutions, more will review their existing programs for natural alignment with industry certifications with the easiest applications being in technology.15 It’s another “cake and eat it too” scenario or compromise, but within the curriculum. Many colleges and universities are offering degrees in cybersecurity, computer science and finance and many of them are placing greater emphasis on either industry certification preparation or actually earning it on the way toward the degree. Ivy Tech Community College and Western Governors University’s websites highlight that their cybersecurity program curriculums are aligned to better prepare students for industry certification.

  7. Badging will continue to advance, but with a slow adoption rate. While the concept of earning a badge for achieving a skill or competency fits the mindset of young adults, as well as those in industries where this is an accepted practice (e.g., technology), adoption will continue at a slow pace, just as it did in 2021 and 2022. One reason is what appears to be a greater willingness toward building in certificates and stackability that support a degree. Addressing this opportunity first may be more palatable for institutions new to badging. Another hurdle is the mindset that badges don’t carry the same quality often associated with participation medals, such as youth scouting activities. However, long-term planning for badging will continue for many institutions as it carries the potential of what a “credit” did for degree-based credentials, but with skills or competency-based initiatives.

  8. Challenges/changes to the accreditation process. This will take a long time. Accreditation has meant quality for students and the institution. It also means that institutions can access federal funds and student aid. One could argue that the criteria and process that accredits an institution are out-of-date, especially given the emergence and normality of online and professional education. The impact for the institutions that offer vibrant professional, continuing and online (PCO) programs and degrees could be significant, as criteria could finally be incorporated to include the adult learner and the voice and needs of the employer. Institutions are not necessarily locked into one accreditor and could potentially shop for a more progressive and flexible accrediting body, one that embraces innovation over accreditors whose criteria may be deemed as excessive or even notoriously picky.

  9. Improved efficiencies that impact revenues or reduce costs will be in focus. Gone are the days of increasing tuition to make up for forecasted deficits, budget cuts, or enrollment declines. In tandem with new revenue generation, many institutions are going to seek out efficiencies, which could include greater or improved partnerships with online program management companies and other providers, even with additional congressional scrutiny, which in turn, could shift non-core services externally. For many institutions, these relationships play a critical role in offsetting potential deficits, although lawmakers want greater transparency and proof of performance, as well as benefit to the student. While no new policies have been enacted, it is likely that greater oversight and accountability will be established by the Department of Education.

  10. Marketing and enrollment management processes will improve in 2023. While outsource relationships with OPM providers will be under the microscope in 2023, internal efficiencies will need to improve. In the past, if an inquirer contacted the institution about a program or degree, it was assumed that conversion to applicant and then to student was high or within acceptable bounds; after all, the institution held the cards. In a new landscape for education, the consumer has more choices. Today’s young adult is also exceedingly more complex than in previous generations, leveraging technology in their inquiry and leaning on influencers such as their family, close friends or social media celebrities in their decisions. As a result, institutions are going to need to review their processes and most likely, gut and redesign them to center on the new learner. Transactional marketing will be replaced with relational enrollment management. Precision and science will influence how, when and who engages the inquirer of the future.

  11. Staffing the progressive professional, continuing and online education unit of the future will also be a challenge in 2023 and beyond. As reported by Inside Higher Ed, community colleges are reporting staff losses as a result of the pandemic and difficulties attracting talent.16 With institutions emerging into a sense of normalcy and lifting hiring freezes, many are finding filling positions difficult. A snap poll conducted by UPCEA during the pandemic showed 38% of respondents said it has been extremely (15%) or very difficult (23%) to fill open positions post-pandemic. Positions that institutions have struggled to fill include instructional designers, program managers, and technical positions, among others As a result, some institutions are relaxing on-premise work requirements and offering sought after employees more flexible work environments. Many jobs are also being categorized as fully remote. After these benefits have been offered, there’s no other choice but to increase salary for these critical and vacant positions. The end result will be a domino effect within the sector as leaders will be more tempted to jump from their existing job with its pre-inflation salary to a higher inflation-corrected opening that offers greater flexibility. In addition, corporate providers in the education sector may also raid colleges and universities of premier talent at a higher pace given their ability to respond more quickly to change, as well as access alternative sources of funding.


We are seeing the transformation of higher education in real-time, driven in part by economics, technology, demographics and a change in societal norms. Higher education could have been more prepared for this a decade ago, but the pain of declining enrollments was gradual, often just a percentage or two annually. As a result of the pandemic, consumers have increased buying power and more choices, as do employers. Higher education will need to innovate on multiple fronts in order to thrive. 2023 and the years that follow will be reshaping and rebuilding years for higher education where job mobility and success will be defined not just by the degree but by the components that could build toward the degree. While one single year is not enough, 2023 will be a year of building stackability and flexibility for the future. It will be a year that we compromise between the degree and the badge. Stackability and non-degree credentials, such as credit certificate in data visualization or the noncredit cybersecurity boot camp certificate that feeds into a degree program, will be the compromise between the higher education, employers and students of the future.

 

Footnotes:

  1. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/ataglance
  2. https://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/automated-mcdonald-texas-17672788.php
  3. https://www.smithcorona.com/blog/millennials-eating-habits-revolutionize-food-logistics/
  4. https://www.axios.com/2022/10/19/axios-finish-line-americans-are-drinking-less
  5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pet_industry
  6. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/12/30/american-pet-spending/
  7. https://nscresearchcenter.org/some-college-no-credential/
  8. https://www.insidetrack.org/resources/short-term-credentials-are-here-to-stay-but-how-do-employers-view-them/
  9. https://www.highereddive.com/news/university-of-redlands-acquiring-Presidio-Graduate-School/638846/
  10. https://www.highereddive.com/news/merger-watch-closed-college-wait-too-long/637883/
  11. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2022/10/14/more-traditional-age-students-enroll-fully-online-universities
  12. https://partners.straighterline.com/disengagedlearnersstudy
  13. https://nscresearchcenter.org/some-college-no-credential/
  14. https://images.learn.anthology.com/Web/BlackboardInc/%7B14a1110b-806b-4f1d-9cdf-44698713f1ef%7D_Whitepaper-UPCEA-Delivering_Alternative_Credentials_in_a_Transformed_Economy.pdf
  15. https://www.aplu.org/news-and-media/News/workcred-aplu-and-upcea-awarded-lumina-grant-to-connect-degrees-and-certifications
  16. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2023/01/04/community-colleges-suffer-employee-shortages#:~:text=Community%20colleges%20across%20the%20country,a%20higher%20education%20consulting%20firm

Recent higher education trends have made it clear that now more than ever, colleges and
universities must have successful strategies for engaging adult learners.

The US birth rate has declined steadily over the past decade, leading to an inevitable reduction
in traditional college enrollees aged 18 to 24. There is also an increasing number of students
simply opting out of the college experience, choosing alternative paths instead.

Higher education institutions face an uphill battle to grow or even maintain enrollment
numbers—and focusing more of their marketing and enrollment efforts on adult learners is one
viable solution.

Adult Learners: The New College Freshmen?

Data from the National Student Clearinghouse, as presented by UPCEA’s very own Jim Fong,
reveals that there is a tremendous opportunity to attract adult learners. The total addressable
market (TAM) of adult enrollment candidates is estimated at over 242 million, including:

  • 93 million adults aged 25+ with a degree
  • 39 million adults with some college but no degree
  • 70 million adults with a high school degree or GED
  • 40 million adults with no high school degree or GED

The pool of potential adult learners far exceeds the traditional higher education market, which
totals a mere 19.3 million potential students for undergraduate and graduate programs
combined. Furthermore, traditional student enrollments in undergraduate and graduate
programs decreased by 4.1% from 2021 to 2022 alone.

It’s safe to say that adult learners who return to school for reasons such as upskilling, changing
careers, or pursuing micro-credentials have become an indispensable population.

Understanding the Adult Learner’s Perspective on Higher Ed

While adult learners present new enrollment opportunities, it’s important to acknowledge that
they are definitively different from traditional college freshmen.

If higher education institutions wish to successfully expand adult learning programs, they must
embrace and convey a compelling value proposition. From branding to marketing to enrollment
strategies, the methods for drawing adult enrollees are in need of an overhaul.

Competition for adult learners is high

As any marketer knows, a large TAM doesn’t automatically translate to high adoption rates.
Higher ed has long relied on traditional enrollees to grow enrollments, leaving the adult learning
market open to competitors offering alternative education pathways such as corporate training,
private online courses, and intensive boot camps.

As the number of college freshmen heads off the demographic cliff, the adult learning space is
certain to become more imperative—and more competitive. Any school that aims to stay ahead
of the pack needs to dive deep and build a new understanding of what adult students want—and
why.

Adult learners have unique priorities

Though the adult learning demographic is hardly monolithic, this category of prospective
students does share several characteristics.

  • They prioritize professional outcomes. Adult learners care more about the end results
    offered by new learning and less about the “rite of passage” experience prioritized by
    many traditional students.
  • They look for program reputation over school brand. While college freshmen tend to
    emphasize brand value of an institution, adult learners are more interested in reputable
    programs with verifiable outcomes.
  • They scrutinize prerequisites. Adult learners value their resources differently from
    younger students and are uninterested in investing time or money into requirements that
    aren’t directly tied to their career goals. Seeking the most efficient path forward, adult
    learners may steer clear of programs with prerequisites that will extend their timeline.
  • They want funding solutions. Adult learners are deeply attuned to ROI and consider cost
    a major factor when researching education options. This demographic looks for clear
    pricing with explicitly outlined funding sources, such as scholarships, grants, financial
    aid, and even continuing education coverage through a current employer.
  • They desire flexibility. Adult learners rarely enjoy the luxury of enrolling in a full-time
    educational program. Members of the over-25 demographic frequently juggle work,
    family, and community obligations that preclude the full-time learning younger students
    often embrace. Adults show a preference for online or hybrid programs as well as
    asynchronous or self-paced programs that allow them to customize the learning
    experience to their current life season.

Attracting Adult Learners: Start with a Fresh Strategy

To appeal to adult learners, higher education institutions must examine—and perhaps
rebuild—their outreach programs from the ground up. The old messages aren’t working on
newer generations of adult learners, and schools need to respond accordingly.

  1. Evaluate your current marketing and enrollment strategies
    Who are you reaching with your current marketing and enrollment efforts? Does your messaging
    exclude crucial segments of the adult learning demographic? Are the adult learner’s priorities
    reflected throughout your marketing creative and program curriculum?
  2. Develop a message that resonates with this new audience
    How can you fine-tune your message to meaningfully connect with adult learners? Or perhaps
    you need to begin with fresh market research and analysis of your programming.
    Adult learners are savvy shoppers with high standards for how they spend their time and money.
    From ad copy to class structure, you must speak directly to the adult learner’s mind and
    emotions.
  3. Streamline the enrollment process
    How frictionless is your enrollment process? Every form, click, call, email, or “next step” is
    work—and that’s especially true for adults who already have hectic lives.
    Removing excessive points of friction from your enrollment process could mean the difference
    between gaining a new student or losing them before they even reach the point of purchase.
    Though it’s true that some friction can serve to disqualify “poor fit” prospects, unnecessary
    friction will only dissuade a prospective student who may have been a great fit for your program.

Adult Learners Are within Your Reach

Colleges and universities have an imperative to extend their educational outreach beyond high
school graduates to the adults who comprise the largest segment of our country’s population. If
these institutions truly believe learning should be a lifelong endeavor, they must make it
accessible and desirable to the millions of adults who are hungry for lifelong learning.

Get to know what adult learners care about, what motivates them, and how education can lend
new purpose to the lives of those with many more decades of life to live. If you align your
marketing and programming to the needs of this ever-present community, you’ll be setting your
school up for ongoing success.

See how MindMax can help.

For 150 years dating back to the 1800s, college enrollment in the U.S. experienced annual growth in enrollments with only a handful of short-term drops during wars and other major societal events. That record of steady increases was disrupted a dozen years ago, by the recession of 2007 to 2009 and has never recovered. Of course, the pandemic triggered a drop, but the predictions that following that drop in 2020 and 2021, enrollments would once again be on the rise in 2022 were wrong. The numbers continued their decline and have not shown a year-over-year increase for the past dozen years.

Despite the long decline in overall higher education enrollments, the percentage of students enrolled in online and distance education has vigorously grown. Yet, many institutions – particularly small and mid-sized universities depend upon on-campus, residential student enrollments for their financial well-being. Without those on-campus students, the costs of operating and maintaining housing, food services, and related revenue-intensive affordances are no longer covered, generating further deficits. The result has been a rise in recent closures and mergers. Often the media focus is on closures – and there have been plenty, with hundreds more colleges now deeply in debt – but, too often we fail to notice the number of mergers. In just the past four years, there have been 95 college mergers, that is more than four times as many as in the prior 18 years, with more on the way.

As colleges and universities suffer enrollment declines, the knee-jerk response has been to raise tuition to make up the revenue deficit. Of course, that drives up student loans. Now, we are approaching $1.75 trillion dollars in student debt. It is startling to see the chart of the rise of more than a trillion dollars in debt over the prior dozen years. At this point, the initiatives crafted to create one-time, partial relief appear to be doomed. Even if partial forgiveness initiatives were to be successful, that would not get to the real cause of the problem, instead we would continue to grow the debt at the same rate, or even faster, from that point. The staggering sum of nearly two trillion dollars stifles growth of the economy and takes an untold toll on the careers of Americans. Paying the principal and towering interest of student loans over decades depletes the spending power of professionals. That, in turn, puts pressure on employers to provide ever-higher salaries to cover the costs to retain satisfied employees.

Increasingly, employers have stepped up to try to break the cycle by no longer requiring degrees for many positions. These include corporate giants such as Google, Bank of America, IBM, and General Motors. Many are implementing skills-based hiring, according to Lucas Mearian from ComputerWorld

While some fields will still mandate academic qualifications, including the medical and legal professions, many more opportunities are now accessible to people without a degree, particularly in tech, according to new research by global HR and payroll services company, Remote. Remote’s study found that skills-based hiring is up 63% in the past year as more employers value experience over academic qualifications. In addition to giving employers a competitive edge by opening up the talent pool, the change is helping to remove career and salary barriers for over two-thirds of adults who do not have a Bachelor’s degree in the United States, the study concluded. Remote’s study is not alone. Forty-five percent of organizations report using a skills framework to provide structure around recruiting and developing their tech workforces; another 36% are exploring the idea, according to CompTIA, a nonprofit association for the IT industry and its workers. 

The move toward skills-based hiring has given momentum to the offering of a vast variety of credentials and certificates. A recent report from the nonprofit Credential Engine documents more than one million (1,076,358) post-secondary credentials being offered in the US. Some credentials are offered by higher education, some by private companies, and others by government organizations. 

There is yet another challenge on the near horizon for higher ed. The demographic cliff is expected to impact the number of high school graduates beginning in 2025. The recession that began in 2007 resulted in a drop in the number of births in the U.S. for a period of years. That drop will be seen in fewer 17-and-18-year-old high school graduates in 2025 and the next few years. With the drop will come more competition for a smaller number of prospective college students. 

All of these factors combine to make the future of higher education look far less bright than it did decades ago. We can expect more campus closures and mergers with the inevitable fallout of jobs and disruption of careers. Those colleges and universities that survive and thrive will be the ones who find new ways to offer affordable and effective programs that serve both students and employers.

Has your university addressed these challenges with a blueprint for new ways to sustain the viability of the institution? How is your career crafted to continue to grow as departments close, efficiency cuts reduce the size of the faculty/staff, and others lose their jobs around you? Will the rapid advance in artificial intelligence enhance or threaten your planned career path? It is a good time to ensure that you are prepared for continued success.

 

This article was originally published in Inside Higher Ed’s Transforming Teaching & Learning blog.