Major Updates

  • Bill with Short-Term Job Training Pell Passes House; Excludes Online Programs
    The COMPETES Act passed the House of Representatives in early February. An amendment to the bill establishes a new short-term job training Pell grant program. Unfortunately, this provision excluded any online-only programs. UPCEA has long advocated for short-term job training Pell programs, and we have and will continue to advocate for the inclusion of eligibility for students of fully online programs in the final bill. As the bill moves forward, we await the announcement of a conference committee between the House and Senate who will work on the discrepancies between each chamber’s version of the bill. Once that is announced, we encourage you and your institutions to reach out to your legislators and those conferees to ask them to keep short-term job training Pell in the mix, and especially to ensure that online programs are eligible. Read more

 

  • Negotiated Rulemaking Committee Discusses Gainful Employment, 90/10 Rule, New Licensure and Certifications Requirement
    The US Department of Education Negotiated Rulemaking Institutional and Programmatic Eligibility Committee finished its second session, and is now heading into its third and final session in March. The second session’s major topics included discussion on Gainful Employment (GE) rule — the qualification of student graduates’ debt-to-earnings rate calculations as marker of quality outcomes, which could disqualify institutions from receiving financial aid as a result of not meeting those standards. In its current iteration, a handful of negotiators signaled that they were unhappy with pieces of the draft GE language that the committee was working on. Another major topic of conversation were Financial Responsibility regulatory changes, as relates to the fiscal stability of institutions. The committee also discussed Certification Procedures issue paper with proposed changes on Program Participation Agreements. This includes new language which requires an institution to prepare students to meet state licensing and certification requirements for every state in which they have the program offered to students. This is an especially important, and potentially onerous, provision for those who offer distance education programs, but may also cause substantial problems even for in-person programs leading to licensure or certifications. There were temperature checks taken on agreement to the language with multiple negotiators providing a negative response.

    The last day of the second session ended with discussion on the 90/10 rule changes.The 90/10 rule is a restriction that a proprietary school can only receive at most 90% of their revenue from federal financial aid sources, and the other 10% must come from other places. Legislative changes to account for other federal sources of revenue, such as GI benefits and other federal funds to be counted towards the 90%, have recently passed. Similarly to other major topics, negotiators had negative reactions to the proposed language on these tweaks. Negotiators must agree on all language in each of the issues discussed to craft the final regulatory proposal. If the committee does not agree on language in the March Session, the Department of Education will craft language for public comment. Read more and provide comments and review issue papers here.

 

Other News

  • New Updates to US ED College Scorecard
    In early February, the U.S. Department of Education announced updates to the College Scorecard to make the tool more useful for students looking into postsecondary education. They have added several metrics that help students compare institutions to other colleges across costs, graduation rates, post-college earnings, and other metrics. The changes reflect the Secretary of Education’s latest priority setting of supporting and encouraging inclusive, affordable postsecondary programs that provide strong career outcomes for students.
    Read more. 

 

 

As artificial intelligence and associated technologies extend their influence in our society, the role of higher education must change. We can no longer prepare learners for static careers in unchanging fields.

We are in the midst of profound change in the nature of employment worldwide. Fueled most recently by the pandemic, the nature of work, including our tools and practices, is undergoing dramatic changes. The Great Resignation, in part, reflects an understanding that many jobs do not have a viable future and that they are not best utilizing the abilities of the employees.

Jobs are on the verge of being altered or replaced by artificial intelligence and AI-assisted programs. Long gone are the years in which colleges prepared students for 30 years in a single career where few changes took place in the job itself. Turnover is rampant. The median length of time that wage and salary workers had been with their current employer was just 4.1 years, as reported by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics in January 2020. Likely, that number has gone down further during the Great Resignation.

We are all familiar with the robotic revolution of prior decades in which assembly-line work positions were lost to robotic assembly lines. That shakeout took a toll on a skilled but less educated population. Human skills were no longer needed because “intelligent” robots could do the job faster, more consistently and at a lower cost to the business. Now, Brookings warns us that the most vulnerable jobs of the future are in better paid and better educated fields: “Our analysis shows that workers with graduate or professional degrees will be almost four times as exposed to AI as workers with just a high school degree. Holders of bachelor’s degrees will be the most exposed by education level, more than five times as exposed to AI than workers with just a high school degree.”

I understand that there is much more to be made of a college degree than merely a trade school preparing the student for work. However, in the current economy, it is abundantly clear that students seek jobs, career advancement and career potential far above all other forms of enrichment and perspective. Yet, as Jeff Selingo points out, “The world of work has changed, while colleges, along with employers, are living in a different era. It’s nearly impossible anymore for colleges to arm students with the vocational hard skills they’ll need to last more than a few years in almost any job after graduation. Most of college graduates’ 20s are spent moving from job to job to further their education and learn additional skills. And the paradox is that job hopping is the primary reason employers are reluctant to invest in workers in the first place.” That reluctance to invest in new workers is further fed by the advancement of less costly, more flexible and easily upgradable AI.

To a significant degree, the AI marketplace is responsive to shortfalls in the number of qualified workers. That is, where employers cannot find an adequate supply of humans to meet their needs, they will turn to AI. Boston Consulting Group sees the near-term future in this area is to engage government, companies and higher education:

To reduce the mismatch in skills, governments should update the education system. They should create more flexible institutions that can anticipate the future needs of companies and refocus on meta skills. Companies need to invest in corporate academies, training partnerships, and constant upskilling and reskilling of their existing workforces. They should also transform their HR functions and processes to cater to the shift in approach needed to hire and retain talent with the new skills in demand. Companies that make these investments and significant changes in their own processes stand to gain a substantial competitive advantage over those that stick with their current approach. Countries that leverage education to create attractive locations for companies will gain a competitive edge over their static neighbors.

Continuing and professional education is thriving both at universities and within the corporate environment. The rise of certificate programs is unprecedented. This is not taking place in a carefully orchestrated fashion. There is no semblance of an organized, concerted effort to identify emerging and future needs, assign specific standards across industries, and subsidize quality programs to meet the changing needs across the economy. Instead, there is more of a Wild West approach with individual universities and corporations creating their own entrepreneurial programs. In too few cases, states or corporate groups are trying to draft a road map to meet the learning needs in industries.

Meanwhile, artificial intelligence promises to transform 500 million white collar jobs in the next five years! The higher education–industry disconnect will take a huge toll on graduates in the workforce who have not been updated and upskilled for the emerging economy. This will further dilute the credibility and perceived value of degrees as they become increasingly outdated and irrelevant.

We need leadership within and across institutions to meet this challenge. A hodgepodge of credentials does not serve learners well. Clarity and specificity in outcomes as well as clear linkages to viable careers are needed to build effective paths of learning that meet the needs of today and tomorrow. Industry has already begun building its own education frameworks to meet its needs. Notably, the Google Career Certificate program has enrolled millions at an economical price point.

Who is leading the charge at your institution to respond to this massive shift in learning needs for our economy? Can you play a role in bringing coherence and meaningful alignment to inter-institutional/industrywide standards for certificate programs to meet the emerging new economy most effectively?

This article was originally published in Inside Higher Ed’s Transforming Teaching & Learning blog

The Olympics was created to foster global peace through competition. It has, over the years, adapted to changes in societal interest and needs. While the original Olympics was held nearly 3,000 years ago, the modern games are just over a century old. During this relatively short period of time, the games have changed in many ways. The events have changed, as have the venues, media coverage, and amenities that support them. With the Winter Olympics currently in full bloom, gone are the snowshoeing and dog sled races, having been replaced by wizardry and death-defying stunts of snowboarding and aerial events.

Like the Olympics, higher education must also change, more than just moving degrees online. The degree will not go away, but like ice skating, it cannot be the only sport. It can remain the centerpiece or foundation, but needs strength, excitement, and modernization around it. Ice skating at the Winter Games is over a century old and is the longest standing Winter Olympics event. While colleges and universities have a centuries-old legacy in Europe, Harvard and William and Mary were the first in the U.S. followed by Yale, Princeton, Columbia and Brown. One could argue that the degree was the foundation for our economy and a majority of careers in our society. Enthusiasts and scholars of Olympic history might say that the foundation of the Winter Olympics is events such as figure skating, skiing or hockey, but change has been afoot with snowboarding, curling, and aerial events.

The degree must be supported by other forms of education. There are too many societal signs pointing toward change:

  • MOOC enrollment has nearly doubled since the start of the pandemic. In 2021, it reached 220 million learners compared to 120 million in 2019 (Class Central 2021). During the same time, the U.S. saw enrollment declines in most community and state colleges. Historically, when the economy was in a recession, adults returned to college. This did not happen in 2020 or 2021. While many adults were huddled in isolation due to the pandemic, the promise of short-term higher wages made it difficult for many to return to college. The substitute of less expensive or easier to access education that is valued by employers in the form of a badge or certificate was attractive as a potential substitute for a degree.

 

  • The Winter Olympics also have given us a snapshot of how powerful technology can be in terms of impacting the future of work. We saw a glimpse of synchronized drone technology at the 2018 Winter Olympics in Seoul, South Korea, but the 2021 Beijing Olympics has showcased robotics and automation in full force. To see eye-popping evidence of automation on display, one only has to Google “robotics,” “Winter Olympics” and “meals” and see food service fully automated from the initial order to creation in the kitchen to piping-hot delivery via conveyors and elevators to plexiglass-enclosed personal dining areas often referenced as “bubbles.” With limited human interaction, the dining areas are immediately cleaned and sanitized after the athlete or visitor finishes their meal. The vision of mass automation puts at risk many jobs of the future, as what has been displayed in Beijing has the potential to replace millions employed in the U.S. food and restaurant industry.

 

  • There also robots reminding visitors to wear a mask. Through various protocols and programming, robots can identify spectators, athletes and others in public areas not wearing masks and inform them that they must do so. This simple function has the potential to replace concierges in the workforce, but also even security or some early-stage law enforcement, such as issuing warnings, traffic violations, security or checkpoint monitoring, and early identification of crime.

 

The Great Resignation has also shown many shortages that have high automation potential, including retail, trucking and transportation, food processing, and manufacturing. Employers will find non-human solutions as long as they are long-term profitable or have an intangible yet positive benefit.

The Winter Olympics also has given us other glimpses of the future that will impact jobs and have a bearing on the future of education. Beyond drones and food production and delivery to the table, security and smart identification systems have been deployed where athletes, guests, visitors, media and workers are tracked to allow proper access and entry into facilities. While this level of security would challenge the values of many Americans, the need for them at this event has been years in the planning. Physical money was also discouraged in favor of a digital wallet. Smart beds were also furnished for many athletes, as was full coverage 5G, all of which are powered by sustainable energy sources, including hydrogen cell buses.

So, the question remains… Can a U.S. degree support the change that is already upon us as well as what a fast-approaching economy has planned? If higher education doesn’t change by offering more nimble, quality, and attractive options to the degree, such as new or alternative credentials offered online and professionally marketed, then it may find itself far from medal contention in a global economy thriving on technological advancements.  

 

21 of Top 25 Ranked Institutions are UPCEA Members

WASHINGTON, D.C. (February 10, 2022) — UPCEA, the association for college and university leaders in online and professional continuing education, is pleased to congratulate the many UPCEA members recognized in the 2022 U.S. News & World Report Best Online Programs rankings.

U.S. News rankings include more than 1,700 online programs, covering bachelor’s and graduate programs across a variety of fields. The U.S. News rankings focus on programs designed to be completely online, excluding schools and programs that are temporarily remote due to the pandemic. Using information provided by participating institutions, the ranking methodologies include factors such as student services and technology, student engagement, and faculty credentials and training.

“The U.S. News and World Report’s annual rankings for online programs serves as a good reminder that UPCEA members continue to innovate and provide incredible online experiences for faculty and students regardless of conditions,” said Julie Uranis, Senior Vice President of Online and Strategic Initiatives for UPCEA. “The last two years have been difficult as many online leaders have been charged with supporting the academic continuity of their institutions with no additional resources. Our members are not only leading successful online enterprises and creating quality programs, but they are doing great things in support of their institutions through the most challenging of circumstances!” 

“We’re proud that Oregon State’s distance students have access to the same rigorous degree programs and can learn online from the same expert faculty as OSU’s on-campus students,” said Oregon State Ecampus Associate Provost Lisa L. Templeton. “Broad access to high-quality online learning opportunities is important now more than ever. We’re pleased to share this national recognition with the entire Oregon State community, and we’re honored to join many of our respected peer institutions on this list.”

 

Twenty-one of the top 25 ranked institutions are members of UPCEA:

1 – Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University–Worldwide

1 – University of Florida

5 – Oregon State University

6 – Arizona State University 

7 – Ohio State University

7 – University of Arizona

7 – University of Central Florida

10 – CUNY School of Professional Studies

10 – North Carolina State University 

10 – University of North Carolina Charlotte

14 – George Washington University

14 – Utah State University

16 – Pennsylvania State University-World Campus

16 – University of Georgia

16 – University of Oklahoma

19 – Creighton University 

19 – Loyola University Chicago

19 – University of Massachusetts Amherst

19 – Washington State University

24 – University of Arkansas

24 – West Texas A&M University

 

“Our online programs extend Ohio State’s academic excellence to students in Ohio and beyond, uplifting the university’s commitment to access and affordability while supporting current and future workforce needs,” said The Ohio State University’s Associate Vice President for Distance Education Robert Griffiths. “We’re proud our efforts have again been recognized in the U.S. News & World Report rankings and by our peers across the country.”

“The University of Arkansas continues to grow and enhance online programs to expand educational access in our rural state and beyond,” said Cheryl Murphy, Vice Provost for Distance Education at the University of Arkansas. “Higher education transforms lives, and online programs are the only option for some students. Through a growing list of online degrees and enhanced student support, we extend the reach of our nationally recognized faculty and provide learners everywhere access to high-quality education. That’s why we are proud that the U.S. News & World Report has ranked our programs among the best in the nation. It is a testament to the hard work of our faculty and staff who are committed to our students’ success.”

Congratulations to all of the UPCEA members recognized in this year’s rankings

“UPCEA member institutions are constantly growing and innovating to best serve today’s students,” said Bob Hansen, CEO of UPCEA. “I’m pleased to see U.S. News & World Report recognizing the incredible efforts of so many of our members in this year’s rankings.”

8 Individuals and 8 Programs Receive Association’s Highest Honors

WASHINGTON, February 9, 2022 – UPCEA, the leader in online and professional continuing education, has announced the recipients of the 2022 Association Awards. The UPCEA Association Awards program includes recognition of both individual and institutional achievement across the UPCEA membership.

Since 1953, UPCEA has recognized its members’ outstanding contributions to the Association and the field, as well as their achievements in innovative programming, marketing and promotion, community development and services, research and publications, and many other areas.

Award recipients will be honored at the 2022 UPCEA Annual Conference, April 11-14 in Orlando.

“The exceptional submissions for this year’s awards exemplify the breadth and depth of the impact our members continue to make on higher education,” said Tanya Vincent, Program Manager, Online Student Services at Western Kentucky University and Co-Chair, UPCEA Awards Committee. “We congratulate and recognize each of this year’s recipients for the myriad ways they serve today’s learners and the online and professional continuing education field.”

The recipients of this year’s awards are as follows:

 

Phillip E. Frandson Award for Literature recognizes the author and publisher of an outstanding work of continuing higher education literature.

Recipient: Students First: Equity, Access, and Opportunity in Higher Education, Paul LeBlanc, Southern New Hampshire University

 

Adelle F. Robertson Emerging Professional Continuing Educator Award recognizes the scholarship, leadership and contributions to the profession of a person who has entered the field within the past five to ten years.

Recipient: Vanessa Williams, Temple University

 

UPCEA Leadership in Diversity and Inclusive Excellence Award recognizes an individual or a program that represents best practices and demonstrates positive impact in promoting cultural shift in the organization that promotes diversity and inclusive excellence.

Recipient: Rutgers University Division of Continuing Studies Diversity, Equity and Inclusion 2021 Strategic Plan, Rutgers University Division of Continuing Studies

 

Dorothy Durkin Award for Strategic Innovation in Marketing and/or Enrollment Management recognizes an individual for achievement in strategic planning, marketing innovation or enrollment management success.
Recipient: Dr. Jason M. Ruckert, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

 

UPCEA Excellence In Teaching Award is presented to individuals who have provided outstanding teaching, course development, mentoring of students, and service to continuing education.

Recipient: Dr. Wanju Huang, Purdue University College of Education

 

UPCEA Outstanding Professional, Continuing, And/Or Online Education Student Award: Credit recognizes outstanding student achievement in professional and continuing education.

Recipient: Linda M. Wilson, Kansas State University

 

UPCEA Research and Scholarship Award recognizes significant new research with implications for professional practice in the field of continuing higher education.

Recipient: UNC Charlotte Center for Teaching and Learning Research on Adjunct Faculty Development, UNC Charlotte

 

Outstanding Program: Credit Award recognizes outstanding professional and continuing education programs allowing students to earn academic credit.
Recipient: Master of Science in Instructional Design and Learning Technology Program, Anderson University (SC)

 

Outstanding Program: Noncredit Award recognizes outstanding professional and continuing education programs that do not offer credit.
Recipient: UCM Learn-as-You-Earn CNA Partnership for Critical Healthcare Positions, University of Central Missouri

 

UPCEA International Leadership Award recognizes an individual for representing innovative leadership in one or more of the following areas: educational programs and services; administrative practices; collaborations and partnerships; or research.

Recipient: Dr. Kristin Palmer, University of Virginia 

 

UPCEA International Program of Excellence Award recognizes a program engaged in activities that promote the exchange of knowledge and ideas of global significance.
Recipient: UD International Coaching Enrichment Certificate Program, University of Delaware

 

UPCEA Business & Operations Award for Operational Excellence recognizes outstanding individual contributions in operations, entrepreneurial, and intra-preneurial work that moves an institution into a more favorable position, specifically in financial, human, administrative and IT operations in professional, continuing and online units at postsecondary institutions.
Recipient: Yissel Salafsky, University of Arizona

 

UPCEA Outstanding Service in Postsecondary Instructional Design Award recognizes outstanding service to the field of instructional design in one or more of the following areas: modeling and disseminating research (via workshops, webinars, conferences, papers, etc.), best practices, innovative methods, and/or mentorship, all for the betterment of the instructional design community.

Recipient: Mel Edwards, Purdue University

 

UPCEA Award for Excellence in Advancing Student Success recognizes an individual or program for advancing the success of students in both credit and non-credit programs.
Recipient: Supporting a Culture of Academic Integrity and Accountability, University of Maryland Global Campus

 

UPCEA Award for Strategic Innovation in Online Education recognizes an institution of higher education that has set and met innovative goals focused on online education and been strategic in the planning, development, implementation and sustainability in line with the institutional mission.
Recipient: Kapi’olani Community College Distance Education Team, Kapi’olani Community College, University of Hawaii System

 

UPCEA Engagement Award recognizes an outstanding mutually-beneficial exchange of knowledge and resources between a UPCEA member institution and one or more external constituents such as local communities, corporations, government organizations, or associations.
Recipients: School of Engineering and Computer Science Outreach Program, Oakland University

 

# # #

 

About UPCEA

UPCEA is the leading association for online and professional continuing education. Founded in 1915, UPCEA now serves the leading public and private colleges and universities in North America. The association supports its members with innovative conferences and specialty seminars, research and benchmarking information, professional networking opportunities and timely publications. Based in Washington, D.C., UPCEA builds greater awareness of the vital link between adult learners and public policy issues. Learn more at upcea.edu.

 

CONTACT:

Molly Nelson, UPCEA Vice President of Communications, [email protected]

 

Widespread misconceptions have arisen, write members of the National Council for Online Education, but when done correctly, online courses can be as effective as face-to-face ones.

At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, students, faculty and administrators faced challenges amid the urgent pivot to emergency remote instruction. The pandemic and resulting quarantines are large-scale crises unlike anything we have ever faced. During the spring of 2020, more than 4,000 U.S. higher education institutions were forced to mobilize emergency remote instruction for more than 20 million students. Moving courses en masse into a crisis-responsive form of distance learning protected the health of our communities and preserved academic continuity for students. Faculty members and support staff displayed heroic levels of creativity, commitment and courage to make it all happen. Read the full article. 

The members of the National Council for Online Education include the Online Learning Consortium (OLC), Quality Matters (QM), UPCEA (University Professional and Continuing Education Association) and WCET (WICHE Cooperative for Educational Technologies).

A tsunami of alternative credentials is emerging to meet the shifting learning needs of those in the workforce. Higher education is looking beyond the dwindling market of 18-year-olds to lifelong, professional and continuing ed to sustain enrollments.

One million fewer students are enrolled in higher education in the U.S. than before the pandemic began. As Nathan M. Greenfield writes in University World News, “Even though much of America’s economy opened up in 2021, America’s university-aged cohort continued to stay away from college and university in record numbers. The number of students enrolled in post-secondary institutions fell 2.7% in 2021, a figure greater than the previous year’s decline of 2.5%. Compared with 2019, there are almost one million fewer students in America’s colleges and universities.”

With fewer students, many universities are grappling with lower overall tuition revenue to sustain their operations. In part as a result of the decline in enrollments and associated revenue, many institutions are scrambling to launch alternative credentials to tap the massive shift of adult learners in the workforce, including those who are part of the “great resignation” and have quit their jobs during the pandemic.

As John Steele of Suitable writes, the alternative credential movement accelerated through the advent of MOOCs over the past decade. Reaching professionals online, the MOOCs provided credentials, including badges, that served those seeking to advance their careers.

The trend toward smaller-than-degree credentials has taken off. Compared to degrees, they are valued for their timeliness, relatively low cost and lesser time investment. The return on investment is apparent in short order, as certificate holders claim enhanced skills and abilities worthy of greater salaries and responsibilities.

Now there are literally thousands of alternative certificate programs, and they are growing daily. Most recently, Arizona State University announced ambitious plans to reach 100 million learners by 2030 through its new online global management and entrepreneurship certificate programNatalie Schwartz writes in Higher Ed Dive, “The certificate program, which will be translated into 40 languages, will be offered through Arizona State’s Thunderbird School of Global Management. An initial donation of $25 million is helping to fund the program, which will make the certificates free to learners through full scholarships. Learners will receive a badge after completing each of five graduate-level courses in the program. Completion of all the courses leads to a certificate granting 15 credit hours that can be applied to degrees at Thunderbird.”

While it may seem relatively easy to throw together a few classes that have identifiable market-driven skills and abilities as learning outcomes, in practice creating a successful certificate program involves much more. There is a temptation to merely scan the available demographic data on projected job growth and student interest to drive the design and launch of a new certificate program. However, the most important link in the process is to reach out to business, government agencies, nongovernmental organizations and industry leaders to create a long-term, continuing, working collaboration on identifying the needed skills, knowledge and abilities.

The keys to developing a successful online certificate program include:

  1. Know your audience. Get to know the prospective students. These may well be those already employed in the field who are seeking career advancement. Your rolls of alums may offer a good starting point to seek out representative samples of these prospective learners. Identify their goals, aspirations and expectations.
  2. Know the employers. Make sure you include the obvious ones in business and industry, as well as the less obvious ones, including those in government agencies, NGOs and education at all levels. The C-suite and HR leaders at regional and national companies and organizations may be best positioned to predict the specific knowledge, skills and abilities they will be seeking in the coming couple of years.
  3. Understand the growth/decline potential. Get to know both the optimistic and the pessimistic sides of predictions for the fields in which your certificate holders will compete.
  4. Update and revise content every year. Engage the professionals at least a couple of times a year to pick up on new developments and emerging trends that your certificate should address.
  5. Teach to the future not the present or past. This is especially important in certificates. Too often we in higher education have been guilty of relying too heavily on textbooks that are already out of date when they are first published. We tap the way things were when we were working in the field, not the way things will be in six months or a year. This means that courses must be updated once or twice every year, without exception.
  6. Design and market to a tightly defined underserved or unserved audience. You can leave room for others who may join your cohorts, but make certain you satisfy your core demographic group very well.
  7. Carefully follow learning initiatives, such as the Google Career Certificates program for effective practices in teaching as well as placing your certificate completers.
  8. Recognize that the pedagogy of teaching a short sequence of classes for a certificate is far different from a long-term degree program. The learners come to you with differing assumptions, defined desired outcomes and context.

Think of the certificate curriculum as existing in an ever-changing environment. It is not a static set of learning outcomes. Your collaboration with professionals in the field is the anchor for your success in this field. Designing courses for these learners is different without the long list of prerequisites and shared gen ed of degree programs. Artificial intelligence, virtual environments and the changing economy will impact what and how you should teach.

UPCEA offers a free curated reading list on alternative credentials with one item posted every day. It may be useful as you seek to keep up with the developments in this field.

Who is leading the certification effort at your institution? As enrollments shift from freshman-centric to professional-oriented, how can you help? It is time for a certificate in your field?

 

This article was originally published in Inside Higher Ed’s Transforming Teaching & Learning blog.